Sixers holding up Amare Deal - Per ESPN

Divide Et Impera

Registered User
Joined
Apr 7, 2003
Posts
14,395
Reaction score
2
Location
Maricopa, AZ
The funny thing about this all is that I would take David Lee at $10m over Amare at $8m. To me, there is a HUGE premium for players who give it up for the game. In a way, seeing Shaq jump over the courtside seats to get a loose ball is what I'm talking about. You know what I mean?
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
The funny thing about this all is that I would take David Lee at $10m over Amare at $8m. To me, there is a HUGE premium for players who give it up for the game. In a way, seeing Shaq jump over the courtside seats to get a loose ball is what I'm talking about. You know what I mean?

Like Eric Byrnes.
 

Bufalay

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
4,679
Reaction score
786
The funny thing about this all is that I would take David Lee at $10m over Amare at $8m. To me, there is a HUGE premium for players who give it up for the game. In a way, seeing Shaq jump over the courtside seats to get a loose ball is what I'm talking about. You know what I mean?

Why not fill the team with a bunch of Lou Amundson's and see how well they do.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,466
Reaction score
16,996
Location
Round Rock, TX
The funny thing about this all is that I would take David Lee at $10m over Amare at $8m. To me, there is a HUGE premium for players who give it up for the game. In a way, seeing Shaq jump over the courtside seats to get a loose ball is what I'm talking about. You know what I mean?

Get real. I'm as critical of Amare as the next guy, but preferring David Lee at a higher salary is insane.
 

Divide Et Impera

Registered User
Joined
Apr 7, 2003
Posts
14,395
Reaction score
2
Location
Maricopa, AZ
Get real. I'm as critical of Amare as the next guy, but preferring David Lee at a higher salary is insane.

Hmmm. I guess you just didn't see this:

The funny thing about this all is that I would take David Lee at $10m over Amare at $8m. To me, there is a HUGE premium for players who give it up for the game. In a way, seeing Shaq jump over the courtside seats to get a loose ball is what I'm talking about. You know what I mean?

Carry on....
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
15,980
Location
Arizona
Get real. I'm as critical of Amare as the next guy, but preferring David Lee at a higher salary is insane.

Especially since I have posted Lee's defensive #'s and he doesn't play any defense. So you trade Amare for Lee. Your rebounding stabilizes a bit, you replace SOME of the offense you lost in Amare but your defense is no better.

Oh....and you pay a higher salary. No thanks. If you trade Amare you do it for someone who plays defense.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
Amare's Bluffing!

Does it really make sense that Amare would punish the Sixers for acquiring him by picking up the option and being stuck in Philly for another year? He said he doesn't want to play for a bad team but he's going to turn around and choose to do so when 2010 might be his last chance to get a big extension?

No way!!!
 

TucsonDevil

Good to be back!
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Posts
2,575
Reaction score
19
Location
SLC, UT
Its really a shame that Amare isn't a motivated player. If he was, all of his/our dreams would come true. The Suns would improve astronomically, and he would get paid $$.

I just laugh/cry when I see him lost on defense, when a rebound goes over his head, or when a quick(or slow) small forward runs around him for an offensive put back.
 

JoRain

Registered
Joined
Jun 16, 2006
Posts
275
Reaction score
0
Location
Riga, Latvia (Europe)
Exactly, there is absolutely no reason why we'd want Igoudala with his contract, or Dalembert for that matter. Iggy is decent, but certainly not worth 12-16 mil per, especially considering that the cap will go down. Dalembert is a poor fit for the system and would only take minutes away from Lopez. Young talent or high draft picks should be the only trades we consider.

completely agree. This is Chad Ford's rumor and according to him Amar'e threats to opt in for next year scared Philly. Then he says Suns is cost conscious themselves and that's why they want dump Amar'e. If Suns are so cost conscious - why in gods name they would take back horrible contracts of Iggy (12 to 14 mil per + player option for 2014) and Dalember, who's owned 12 mil for next season?
and who is going to play PF after this trade? Griffin?
only way this happens if Philly includes Speights - another offensive minded big man who doesn't rebound or play defense.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
This whole Philly rumor really doesn't make sense when you think about it..

Iggy makes:
12.3M$ in 2011
13.5M$ in 2012
14.7M$ in 2013
15.9M$ in 2014

Why the heck would we want that? We likely won't even offer Amare that much. Gambo expect the Suns to offer something around 13M$/per season for Amare in an extension.

Iggy makes like 14.5M$ per season. We would be much better off extending Amare for 16-17M$ per season than taking on Iggy.
 

jandaman

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Posts
1,263
Reaction score
3
Suns should trade with Nets.

Because as Slin stated, Iguadala, as good as he is.... making 15 million a year as a second tier/option player will be OVERPAID severely likely to be around 200% overpaid when the new CBA comes around.

Nets can give these players.

Yi + 2011 pick (top 3 protected), if it is a top 3 pick, it becomes unprotected in 2012 + Simmons (expiring) + Lee OR T.Williams (prospects)

If the Nets a re holding back with T.Wiiliams then, Suns can loosen up the protection to top 5 protected for 2011 and top 3 protected in 2012 (if 2011 becomes top 5).



Yi at this POINT in time, is a poor man's Barganani, a very poor man's Dirk. But more athletic and still has room to grow than both.


Look at this potential "under 25" line-up come 2011-2012 season.

C: Lopez
PF: Yi
SF: Clark
SG: T.Williams/Lee
PG: Dragic

No superstar, but you have to factor the Suns will have 2 lottery picks concecutive years in 2011 and 2012, potential 2 top 10s.

Nash expires + J.Rich expires etc.

You have about 20 Million expiring, which I think 8-9 Million free to sign a "star".

Plus Nash can sign a 2 year for minimum to retire as a Sun and join coaching staff (shooting and offense coach)
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
And I am actually an Iggy fan and would like to see him on my team but I don't see how that trade makes sense for us unless we get a pick.

We'd have to find a 3rd team that wants to give up picks and equally long contracts for Dalembert, since I wouldn't want him to steal minutes from Robin.
 

tobiazz

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Posts
2,153
Reaction score
4
Dalembert leads the Sixers in in FT% this season at 84%!
 

jagu

#13 - Legendary
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Posts
4,772
Reaction score
207
Iguadala?? Really? How does this make the Suns better? Stupid deal, but I guess we can get a guy back who can be of use with Iggy and Dalembert so I can see why the Suns would do it.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
I think Iguodala would be a Joe Johnson (in ATL) level star here in Phoenix. People on this board are underatting how good he is. He just gets lost on the Sixers but he is athletic, he is clutch, he can handle, and he can pass. He is a better shooter then he is given credit for too.

Nash would make him a 25ppg guy easy.
 

joshstmarie

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Posts
1,671
Reaction score
1
Location
Seattle
This whole Philly rumor really doesn't make sense when you think about it..

Iggy makes:
12.3M$ in 2011
13.5M$ in 2012
14.7M$ in 2013
15.9M$ in 2014

Why the heck would we want that? We likely won't even offer Amare that much. Gambo expect the Suns to offer something around 13M$/per season for Amare in an extension.

Iggy makes like 14.5M$ per season. We would be much better off extending Amare for 16-17M$ per season than taking on Iggy.


It makes plenty of sense. Sarver and Co dont want to build from scratch. They would rather reload. Its not like we couldnt get rid of iggy if we wanted to down the road, a player like him regardless of the contract is always going to be in demand as long as hes healthy.
 

TucsonDevil

Good to be back!
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Posts
2,575
Reaction score
19
Location
SLC, UT
...Its not like we couldnt get rid of iggy if we wanted to down the road, a player like him regardless of the contract is always going to be in demand as long as hes healthy.

Isn't J-Rich a 'player like him'? I don't see anyone looking to take him...
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
It makes plenty of sense. Sarver and Co dont want to build from scratch. They would rather reload. Its not like we couldnt get rid of iggy if we wanted to down the road, a player like him regardless of the contract is always going to be in demand as long as hes healthy.

Not really, you could have said the same thing about Richardson a year ago. Nobody will want to touch Iguodala's contract with a 10 foot pole once the new CBA is done.

Iguodala is very overpaid, the Suns would be stupid to take on his contract. If they did that they might as well re-sign Amare for a lot of money because Amare is by far the better and more valueable player.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
Isn't J-Rich a 'player like him'? I don't see anyone looking to take him...

If the Suns made this deal they would have 4 shooting guards, non of which really play the point that well.

Barbosa
Dragic
JRich
Iggy

One of these guys would have to be involved in the deal or the Suns would have to make a second move, at least before next season.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
The Iggy/Daly contracts plus the fact that Lopez is starting to play well makes this deal pointless. I feel a MIA offering of O'Neal, Beasley & their 2 first rounders would be a better deal. O'Neal expires after this year but he along with Beasley will keep us competive enough to screw OKC into a late first rounder. The first rounders give us an opportunity to rebuild with some good young players. MIA will not need their picks as they would still have Chalmers, Cook to go along with Amare, Haslem & Wade. It could help them land LeBron if he sees 2 All-Stars in their prime in place.
 
Last edited:

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
The Iggy/Daly contracts plus the fact that Lopez is starting to play well makes this deal pointless. I feel a MIA offering of O'Neal, Beasley & their 2 first rounders would be a better deal. O'Neal expires after this year but he along with Beasley will keep us competive enough to screw OKC into a late first rounder. The first rounders give us an opportunity to rebuild with some good young players. MIA will not need their picks as they would still have Chalmers, Cook to go along with Amare, Haslem & Wade. It could help them land LeBron if he sees 2 All-Stars in their prime in place.

Best deal I've heard. Is this for real?
 

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
Not really, you could have said the same thing about Richardson a year ago. Nobody will want to touch Iguodala's contract with a 10 foot pole once the new CBA is done.

Iguodala is very overpaid, the Suns would be stupid to take on his contract. If they did that they might as well re-sign Amare for a lot of money because Amare is by far the better and more valueable player.

Ya this
 
Top