Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Episode VII)

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,920
Reaction score
877
Location
In The End Zone
It's just going to be good to have a young Jedi (in the Skywalker line, IMO) that isn't a WHINY FREAKING BABY. I love, love, love Rey. And I kind of also love that Kylo Ren needs anger management counseling. Dude loses his stuff all the time. Un. Sta. Ble.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,920
Reaction score
877
Location
In The End Zone
Lots of recycling:

Force Awakens = A New Hope

Starkiller Base = Death Star

General Hux = Grand Moff Tarkin
Snoke = Emperor
Kylo Ren = Darth Vader

Rey = Luke (desert orphan, future Jedi)
Finn = Leia (Former First Order Member, Former Imperial Senate Member)
BB-8 = R2-D2
Han = Obi Wan (older guide to the greater universe)
Poe Dameron = Han Solo (hotshot pilot and coolest guy ever)
Chewbacca = Chewbacca :D
Luke Skywalker = Yoda

That being said, there is a certain beauty to the same story repeating in new ways over and over, if that is one's perspective of how the universe works. I am still upset about certain elements, but I will grant that this is a solid foundation for what could eventually become the best trilogy of the bunch. I guess I need to go see it again just to make sure.


Maz is Yoda.

I also think, however, that Finn is the best of the new characters, something new we have NOT seen. A rogue stormtrooper. He gives backstory and meaning to them, as well as insight. Also, kind of sad they are stolen away and zombified. Finn is a freaking awesome character, and a new twist in a movie that pretty much rhymed with A New Hope.
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Maz is Yoda.

I also think, however, that Finn is the best of the new characters, something new we have NOT seen. A rogue stormtrooper. He gives backstory and meaning to them, as well as insight. Also, kind of sad they are stolen away and zombified. Finn is a freaking awesome character, and a new twist in a movie that pretty much rhymed with A New Hope.

I considered Maz as Yoda. They were both Force sensitive, and guarding a place where the hero had a Dark Force vision. And they are both around 1,000 years old. But she was pretty much cast aside as an afterthought halfway through the movie. There are even articles of how they left her scenes in the second half of the movie on the cutting room floor (she was initially the one handing the lightsaber to Leia in the trailers).

I almost feel she was the Lando character. An old friend of Han, owner of some sort of establishment where they seek refuge. She clearly has a connection to Bespin because that is where Luke lost his hand. They shot scenes with her joining up with the Resistance, a la Lando with the Rebellion. But after they cut her out, I wonder if they will find anything for her to do in further installments.

I gave "Yoda" to Luke because he is the reclusive Jedi Master that will complete the hero's training. You could also call Luke the Obi-Wan, since his apprentice "betrayed and murdered" the new generation of Jedi, forcing the master to go into hiding.
 
Last edited:

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,234
Location
Arizona
I considered Maz as Yoda. They were both Force sensitive, and guarding a place where the hero had a Dark Force vision. But she was pretty much cast aside as an afterthought halfway through the movie. There are even articles of how they left her scenes in the second half of the movie on the cutting room floor (she was initially the one handing the lightsaber to Leia in the trailers).

I almost feel she was the Lando character. An old friend of Han, owner of some sort of establishment where they seek refuge. She clearly has a connection to Bespin because that is where Luke lost his hand. They shot scenes with her joining up with the Resistance, a la Lando with the Rebellion. But after they cut her out, I wonder if they will find anything for her to do in further installments.

I gave "Yoda" to Luke because he is the reclusive Jedi Master that will complete the hero's training. You could also call Luke the Obi-Wan, since his apprentice "betrayed and murdered" the new generation of Jedi, forcing the master to go into hiding.
"Where's my boyfriend? I like that wookie." lol
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,507
Reaction score
15,594
Location
Arizona
That being said, there is a certain beauty to the same story repeating in new ways over and over, if that is one's perspective of how the universe works.

Which is exactly my point. That is the very foundation of the universe. If you are going to complain about the repetitive nature of ALL THE FILMS....you should really stop watching. I can point out things regurgitated in every single film. Star-killer base is the one that bugs me the most but if they don't don't use that plot device again....I will be happy.
 
Last edited:

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,363
Reaction score
68,444
Which is exactly my point. That is the very foundation of the universe. If you are going to complain about the repetitive nature of ALL THE FILMS....you should really stop watching. I can point out things regurgitated in every single film. Star-killer base is the one that bugs me the most but if they don't don't use that plot device again....I will be happy.

Yeah... No. The repetition started coming into play in Jedi and that plus the Ewoks made it the weakest of the OT. And the prequels as a whole were awful for a host of reasons, redundancy being a big reason.

That said, Just saw it for second time. Really, really liked the first 2/3 of the movie, because there was enough new mixed in with some old, but the last act felt like something from a completely different movie... That I had already seen and done much better.
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Yeah well, if the Journal of the Whills is canon, and they are truly immortals recording the rise and fall of the universe's powers, then the three trilogies would be interpreted as the Journal showing how everything old is new again.

Or something.

:D
 

Azlen

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 29, 2004
Posts
3,724
Reaction score
943
...That said, Just saw it for second time. Really, really liked the first 2/3 of the movie, because there was enough new mixed in with some old, but the last act felt like something from a completely different movie... That I had already seen and done much better.

There are two definite things I would have changed in the movie.

I would have changed the setting of Jakku to something less sand duney. It was too similar to Tatooine. You can make something desolate and remote without having sand dunes.
I also would have reworked the last act to get rid of the planet killing weapon aspect. We've already seen two death stars and didn't need a third. It shouldn't have been too hard to tweak the story to have another reason for infiltrating the base.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,507
Reaction score
15,594
Location
Arizona
Yeah... No. The repetition started coming into play in Jedi and that plus the Ewoks made it the weakest of the OT. And the prequels as a whole were awful for a host of reasons, redundancy being a big reason.



That said, Just saw it for second time. Really, really liked the first 2/3 of the movie, because there was enough new mixed in with some old, but the last act felt like something from a completely different movie... That I had already seen and done much better.


Oh yes...yes. So basically the repetition started in the originally trilogy with the last one and the first basically with the same goal. Counting TPM and the droid ship having the same goal as two of the previous films.

In essence three of the first 4 films. Like I said......repetition was part of the franchise long before this film. It's how Lucas designed the overall arch.

If this movie had been the first in all the movies....ANH would have been a joke. You say you are surprised how much people give this movie a pass but it's more glaring to me how many people give ANH a pass just because it broke new ground.
 
Last edited:

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,363
Reaction score
68,444
Oh yes...yes. So basically the repetition started in the originally trilogy with the last one and the first basically with the same goal. Counting TPM and the droid ship having the same goal as two of the previous films.

In essence three of the first 4 films. Like I said......repetition was part of the franchise long before this film. It's how Lucas designed the overall arch.

If this movie had been the first in all the movies....ANH would have been a joke. You say you are surprised how much people give this movie a pass but it's more glaring to me how many people give ANH a pass just because it broke new ground.

Agree to disagree. And you say 3 of the first 4 repeat themselves. Uh... No. Jedi and Menace repeat what came before it and that's why those movies weren't nearly as good... Because everyone had seen much of the elements before. And again, I could care less what Lucas did writing backwards in the Prequels to create symmetry with the Original Trilogy because doing that was a major reason those movies sucked.

And the idea that A New Hope basically started a religion of Star Wars devotees never seen before or after with movies simply because it broke new ground is really simplistic thinking. If that was the case, 2001, which REALLY broke new ground in film would have been the biggest movie ever... But it didn't. Star Wars was the phenomena it was because it broke new ground AND had a plot and more importantly CHARACTERS that everyone ADORED. Ignoring that is mind-boggling to me.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Brian in Mesa

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,734
Reaction score
24,311
Location
Killjoy Central
You can tell a person's age just by whether they call the original film ANH or simply Star Wars. If you think it was popular only because "it broke new ground," I'd respectfully disagree. We get that you don't like it as much as some of the other films, but that doesn't diminish the film itself.

It is and always will be my favorite of the series. I saw it in the theater (and once at a drive-in) as a kid - multiple times (which my mom and dad could not understand). Loved seeing it on the huge original Cine Capri screen.

cheese summed it up pretty well in a previous thread:

Star Wars is still the greatest blockbuster of all time. Anyone trying to degrade that movie is high as a kite as far as I'm concerned. It had an insanely scary bad guy, a great old man mentor, a rebel without a cause with Solo, a young (slightly annoying) but still heroic Luke and hot sassy ass Princess. That movie was simply brilliant as far as I'm concerned and the very definition of FUN.

:jedi:
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
May Contain Spoilers So Read with Caution

I finally saw it this morning(yes, 9:30am) and while I enjoyed the film, it wasn't knock my socks off good. Reason being is that there remains a lot of unanswered questions, questions that were made even before the movie started. Parts of the plot made no sense. At the end of ROTJ the Empire was defeated, I guess, based off of the celebrations shown after the reworked version(the original only showed the celebration on Endor which would only be a battle victory, not necessarily the war). I know that the sequel books are no longer official canon, there remains a ton of questions as to what happened in the galaxy after the Battle of Endor. Did the Empire truly fall out of power? Usually if an emperor is killed, there is someone there to jump in his seat. Vader died as well so there was most likely a Governor who would pick up the mantel. Even though the Death Star was destroyed and Palpatine and Vader are dead, it doesn't mean that the Empire was crushed for good.

This brings me to a question of how Maz ended up with Luke's lost light saber from Bespin. We know it's the Bespin light saber because it's blue whereas the ROTJ light saber was green. I know an evil clone of Luke was created in the Zahn books(Luuke) from his severed hand and he had his light saber but how did some odd creature end up with it?

The First Order seemed massive and overreaching however they've resorted to kidnapping infants and small children and indoctrinating them into being stormtroopers instead of using clones as the Empire did. And how were they able to create a planet/Death Star without anyone knowing about it?

In the opening scroll, it mentioned that someone had infiltrated the First Order, did they ever mention who that was?

I have more questions but to me this movie, until several, and I do mean several questions are answered, was just one big deus ex machina.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,507
Reaction score
15,594
Location
Arizona
Agree to disagree. And you say 3 of the first 4 repeat themselves. Uh... No. Jedi and Menace repeat what came before it and that's why those movies weren't nearly as good...


Because everyone had seen much of the elements before. And again, I could care less what Lucas did writing backwards in the Prequels to create symmetry with the Original Trilogy because doing that was a major reason those movies sucked.

Yes...so 3 out of the first 4 films use the exact same goal with subplots mixed in but ultimately you have rebels destroy thing X to stop the bad guys in their tracks. You can carve it up how you want. It's the same thing in 3 of the first 4 films.

And the idea that A New Hope basically started a religion of Star Wars devotees never seen before or after with movies simply because it broke new ground is really simplistic thinking. If that was the case, 2001, which REALLY broke new ground in film would have been the biggest movie ever... But it didn't. Star Wars was the phenomena it was because it broke new ground AND had a plot and more importantly CHARACTERS that everyone ADORED. Ignoring that is mind-boggling to me.

It's simplistic? It's not. The original Star Wars was not an Oscar level screenplay. It had a mix of bad acting and good. It absolutely was something nobody had seen before. It broke new ground in special FX. It had iconic scenes for sure. That is absolutely why it created the following it did. Nobody had seen anything like it. I never suggested otherwise or ignored any of it.

I won't even get into all the plot holes, the prodding pace and all the stuff that was just glossed over. There is a reason why after Empire people easily adopted that as their favorite. Enough said.

You can tell a person's age just by whether they call the original film ANH or simply Star Wars. If you think it was popular only because "it broke new ground," I'd respectfully disagree. We get that you don't like it as much as some of the other films, but that doesn't diminish the film itself.

It is and always will be my favorite of the series. I saw it in the theater (and once at a drive-in) as a kid - multiple times (which my mom and dad could not understand). Loved seeing it on the huge original Cine Capri screen.

cheese summed it up pretty well in a previous thread:
:jedi:


That doesn't mean squat. Although I admit, the first time I watched Star Wars wasn't in the theater I was at the special premier of Empire Strikes back at the Cine Capri. I still have photos somewhere of all the wax figures in the lobby that were brought in just for the viewing. My older brother refers to it as ANH as well and he did see it in the theater and a also was at a special test screening of the original (it still had Jabba in it as a human). So....not sure where you get that from.

I am not diminishing the impact Star Wars had on film. That would be stupid. However, there is a reason Empire is vastly viewed as superior and there is a hot debate between many fans over ROTJ and Star Wars even today.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,363
Reaction score
68,444
Yes...so 3 out of the first 4 films use the exact same goal with subplots mixed in but ultimately you have rebels destroy thing X to stop the bad guys in their tracks. You can carve it up how you want. It's the same thing in 3 of the first 4 films.
.

You do realize that A) the actual narrative thrust of the Jedi wasn't destroy the Death Star, right? That was the B plot of the movie. The A plot of the movie was Luke having to bring his father back from the dark side and defeating the Emperor. That was the climax of the entire series. The Death Star was just a complication. Trying to argue otherwise is an exercise in futility.

And again, you say I'm "carving things up"... Wrong. I'm showing that in the two movies that made people absolutely fall in love with Star Wars it didn't repeat itself and that's one of the reasons it was so fresh. The ensuing movies then started rehashing the same elements and that's the reason those next two movies weren't neArly as beloved and one of them was even loathed. You can say the same thing was repeated 3 times, because ANH STARTED everything. the definition of REPEAT is to do something AGAIN. You get that, right? And the more Lucas repeated himself, the less people liked the movies.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,742
Reaction score
23,893
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
It's just going to be good to have a young Jedi (in the Skywalker line, IMO) that isn't a WHINY FREAKING BABY. I love, love, love Rey. And I kind of also love that Kylo Ren needs anger management counseling. Dude loses his stuff all the time. Un. Sta. Ble.

Absolutely. This was a big plus. I also loved the 'anger'.

And I'm with you, Cheese, on Star Wars. It still sits a solid second because of everything you said. And any repeating comes AFTER Star Wars because, it is CLEARLY the first movie. This is beyond dispute. None of that timeline crap holds water.
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
You do realize that A) the actual narrative thrust of the Jedi wasn't destroy the Death Star, right? That was the B plot of the movie. The A plot of the movie was Luke having to bring his father back from the dark side and defeating the Emperor. That was the climax of the entire series. The Death Star was just a complication. Trying to argue otherwise is an exercise in futility.

And again, you say I'm "carving things up"... Wrong. I'm showing that in the two movies that made people absolutely fall in love with Star Wars it didn't repeat itself and that's one of the reasons it was so fresh. The ensuing movies then started rehashing the same elements and that's the reason those next two movies weren't neArly as beloved and one of them was even loathed. You can say the same thing was repeated 3 times, because ANH STARTED everything. the definition of REPEAT is to do something AGAIN. You get that, right? And the more Lucas repeated himself, the less people liked the movies.
I often wonder if Lucas kept in the script of ROTJ that the battle was on Kashyyyk with Wookies instead of on Endor with a bunch of teddy bears would Jedi be held in a higher esteem.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,363
Reaction score
68,444
I often wonder if Lucas kept in the script of ROTJ that the battle was on Kashyyyk with Wookies instead of on Endor with a bunch of teddy bears would Jedi be held in a higher esteem.

It would probably be as beloved as Empire. The Ewoks suck, but the first act saving Solo is freaking awesome and the 3rd act trifecta of space war, land war and Luke v. Vader v. Emperor and Vader ultimately redeeming himself was pretty awesome. But the abundance of Ewok in the middle was just too cute and didn't really fit the rest of the saga till that point.
 
OP
OP
Brian in Mesa

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,734
Reaction score
24,311
Location
Killjoy Central
It would probably be as beloved as Empire. The Ewoks suck, but the first act saving Solo is freaking awesome and the 3rd act trifecta of space war, land war and Luke v. Vader v. Emperor and Vader ultimately redeeming himself was pretty awesome. But the abundance of Ewok in the middle was just too cute and didn't really fit the rest of the saga till that point.

At least the Ewoks weren't CGI. :D
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,507
Reaction score
15,594
Location
Arizona
You do realize that A) the actual narrative thrust of the Jedi wasn't destroy the Death Star, right? That was the B plot of the movie. The A plot of the movie was Luke having to bring his father back from the dark side and defeating the Emperor. That was the climax of the entire series. The Death Star was just a complication. Trying to argue otherwise is an exercise in futility.

Did you notice I said main goal and said plot device? Star Wars has always been a soap opera about family that happens to be in space. Lucas has stated that in several interviews. So, I don't understand who are you arguing with on that point. That was never my point. My point was that repetition in different forms was evident in the first trilogy and into the second.

And again, you say I'm "carving things up"... Wrong. I'm showing that in the two movies that made people absolutely fall in love with Star Wars it didn't repeat itself and that's one of the reasons it was so fresh. The ensuing movies then started rehashing the same elements and that's the reason those next two movies weren't neArly as beloved and one of them was even loathed. You can say the same thing was repeated 3 times, because ANH STARTED everything. the definition of REPEAT is to do something AGAIN. You get that, right? And the more Lucas repeated himself, the less people liked the movies.

Don't we agree on that? Didn't I say the same thing? The FX pushed the envelope. It sparked imaginations. To say otherwise wouldn't be true. It doesn't change all the shortcomings I stated before. I think all the great things about it allowed people to overlook all it's bad. If you don't agree that's cool but I am not the first to say so. If you don't think ROTJ had a huge impact on kids and women for that matter you're kidding yourself. I am pretty sure ROTJ probably had the most appeal to a wider demographic than the first two.

We actually seem to be agreeing one of the weak points of the entire series is some of the rehash. The concept of the movies "echoing" each other and "rhyming" were words from Lucas. Not me. That tells me it was intentional. Star Wars does that in spades (no matter how big or small). When 3 out of the first 4 movies destroyed weapon X to stop side B from a major victory.....you must get that it is repetitive regardless of subtext, subplot main plot or otherwise. You don't get to cherry pick where you draw the line on the movies. Lucas made 6 films not 2.

My original point was this movie was no more repetitive if you look at all the films that proceeded it. My followup was this is what Lucas intended. The point was never if you look at only the first two films of the six he made (which is where you keep steering it to). Nobody argued "when" people fell in love with the franchise.

Maybe Lucas's concept was flawed from jump. I don't know. Maybe it was execution. Maybe it was both.

I often wonder if Lucas kept in the script of ROTJ that the battle was on Kashyyyk with Wookies instead of on Endor with a bunch of teddy bears would Jedi be held in a higher esteem.

It would have been rated higher with die hard fans for sure. I think for years the planet most fans wanted to see was Kashyyyk. Although #3 out of 6 films is not exactly low esteem. In some polls I looked up tonight it was rated pretty close to the original film. I know over the years talking to people it seems ROTJ ranks better with kids and women verses the first one. I know my wife and kids and most of my friends wives love ROTJ as their favorite. It's hard to know for sure because I am sure most woman and kids are not going to participate in those polls I would imagine. It's people like us on this forum that would mostly participate totally disregarding a huge portion of the demographic.

I think I read that this time around almost 4 out of every 10 people who watched this movie were women. That wasn't because of the first two films. Women and kids liked the Teddy Bears regardless of what we think as die hard fans. So...how do you appeal to them? Evidently, creating a cute robot and making the lead a bad-a woman worked. The first thing my wife said...I love the lead and new Jedi is Rey. My daughter? I love BB8.

Personally, I know I still wonder to this day what ROTJ would have looked like with Kashyyk. I have heard some argue with the technology back then it would have looked like muppets on steroids. I think I still would have liked to see it myself. Although, my wife and daughter probably wouldn't give two sheets about Star Wars if one of the movies had not had Ewoks in it.

Star Wars is so much richer of an experience being able to share it with my wife and daughter and not just my son. I love that the entire family is now into Star Wars and can't wait to see the next one. I felt like this movie was able to appeal to them without pandering and taking the awesome out of the Star Wars I love.
 
Last edited:

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
Star Wars is a soap opera/serial. Lucas said as much that he was inspired by Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,507
Reaction score
15,594
Location
Arizona
Star Wars is a soap opera/serial. Lucas said as much that he was inspired by Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers.

Yep. Is anybody else curious where his 3 treatments of the next 3 movies were going? He pretty much called this movie a fan movie and not where he would have gone. My guess is it would have been heavier on the family melodrama stuff. I hope they leak or come out as some alternative universe type thing someday. Who knows maybe they steal pieces of it for future films.

By the way..if you were not already pumped for the next installment.....JJ Abrams has read the next script and wishes he had signed on to direct it.

http://www.cnet.com/news/j-j-abrams-next-star-wars-script-is-so-good-i-wish-i-were-directing/
 
Last edited:

BillsCarnage

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
5,827
Reaction score
1,197
Location
The Flip Side
By the way..if you were not already pumped for the next installment.....JJ Abrams has read the next script and wishes he had signed on to direct it.

http://www.cnet.com/news/j-j-abrams-next-star-wars-script-is-so-good-i-wish-i-were-directing/
I think Rian is going to be under more pressure than JJ with Ep8. JJ had a track record of Lost and Star Trek (among others) and while Looper and Brick were good they're not Star Wars. Sure ppl were concerned with JJ, but in the end he delivered what fans wanted and set the bar high.

Rian is a big fan of Gordon-Levitt, so are the odds high he'll be in Ep8? :)

But even Kasden seems excited to see where Ep8 goes.

http://geektyrant.com/news/lawrence...ending-and-the-crazy-different-han-solo-movie
 
Last edited:

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I think Rian is going to be under more pressure than JJ with Ep8. JJ had a track record of Lost and Star Trek and while Looper and Brick were good they're not Star Wars. Sure ppl were concerned with JJ, but in the end he delivered what fans wanted and set the bar high.

But even Kasden seems excited to see where Ep8 goes.

http://geektyrant.com/news/lawrence...ending-and-the-crazy-different-han-solo-movie

He did direct Breaking Bad: Ozymandias, considered by many the single greatest episode of any series in television history.

He has about the same level of movie experience as Joss Whedon before he took on the Avengers, so I feel pretty good about a great TV director taking on a huge, huge feature film.
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Lucas originally envisioned the original trilogy only having a single Death Star, which would be destroyed in ROTJ. The script was then re-worked to include it in the first movie.

I often wonder what the series would have looked like if the Death Star was a constant threat throughout the original trilogy. It would have avoided repetition. However, the thrill of the first Death Star's destruction is probably one of the most iconic moments in all of cinema. Would Star Wars have been so successful without it, if they had opted for a different finale?

Also, I am going to do a little fan fiction, re: the prequels here.

I think the Anakin storyline missed some great opportunities. Consider that if instead of fighting the Trade Federation or droid armies, the Jedi were pressed into service to fight back a relentless enemy. What if the Mandalorians or a Sith Army invaded Republic space and planet-after-planet fell to them?

What if Anakin discovered that the only way to have the strength to repel them was to tap into the Dark Side? Initially, he his hailed as a hero, but as it seduces him more and more, he starts making more extreme decisions until the Jedi finally see him as a threat. Then he turns on them to become Darth Vader.

That would have been better than a whiny momma's boy who wants to save his wife, IMO. I am guessing Lucas opted for a droid army because he didn't want his heroes to slaughter real people (for the kids). I think that decision drove him to water down the actual threat that the Jedi really faced.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,593
Posts
5,408,558
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top