Yeah....his winning record relied on two HOF QB's, and then he rode those teams into the ground. You can do better, imo.You’re right... the other playoffs runs were with Brett Favre.... he’s had 2 HOF qbs and only 1 ring.
Yeah....his winning record relied on two HOF QB's, and then he rode those teams into the ground. You can do better, imo.
Yep, it's like asking somebody if they'd rather be punched in the gut or in the face.Just because he’s better than Wilks, doesn’t make him a good option.
So, then, is it safe to say that the coaches of Tarkenton, Marino, Kelly, Fouts, Moon, were a detriment to them? McCarthy at least won a Super Bowl while Shula never did with Marino, Grant, Levy, Coryell(who many on this forum believe he belongs in the HOF) didn't.McCarthy has had a top five all time QB during an era where QB's performances matter more than ever. He has had a solid front office, that while it has struggled to field a good defense, has done a reasonable job to surround Rodgers with solid players. Often his offensive schemes have been the issue, not QB play.
He has clearly been a detriment to Rodgers play; Rodgers often makes plays outside of his schemes.
He's going to end up somewhere and be successful.Sounds like Philly fans when they wanted Andy Reed gone.....
Mike is good and will land on his feet....he's a good coach and 5 times the coach Wilks is.
Yeah....his winning record relied on two HOF QB's, and then he rode those teams into the ground. You can do better, imo.
So you want him?Nah he took over a 4-win Packers team and resurrected Favre’s career. They should’ve made the SB in 07’.
He at least went 11-5 without Brady.You guys realize successful coaches are most likely tied to good QBs. Belichick was 5-14 in NE and they wanted him run out of town until Bledsoe went down and this guy named Brady took over. I guess some here wouldn't want Belichick because he hasn't won a thing without Brady.
So, then, is it safe to say that the coaches of Tarkenton, Marino, Kelly, Fouts, Moon, were a detriment to them? McCarthy at least won a Super Bowl while Shula never did with Marino, Grant, Levy, Coryell(who many on this forum believe he belongs in the HOF) didn't.
Aaaannnnddd as usual, changing the perimeters of the argument.Different era. Nice try.
That had won 4 straight division titles before having a down year.Nah he took over a 4-win Packers team and resurrected Favre’s career. They should’ve made the SB in 07’.
I just don't know. Obviously he was able to step in and fine tune an already good team but I'm not so sure he can take a young, bad team and make them good. He's never shown that he can that I know of. Might be a good coach but not in every situation.So all former QBs should be coaches? Or if you have a good QB it's a sign it's all the QB and not the coach? Might as well field a team of all QBs at every position. Fact is McCarthy is a good coach period. We should be grateful if he is the one to get us out of Wilks hell. Make no mistake even after beating GB it's still hell
Aaaannnnddd as usual, changing the perimeters of the argument.
I just don't know. Obviously he was able to step in and fine tune an already good team but I'm not so sure he can take a young, bad team and make them good. He's never shown that he can that I know of. Might be a good coach but not in every situation.
If Rodgers and Rosen are buddies this may not be good news if one wants McCarthy as the Cardinals next HC but it does open up the possibility that McCarthy might be both a beneficiary and victim of having Rodgers as his QB.Aaron Rodgers Regularly Changed Mike McCarthy's Playcalls at Line of Scrimmage
Sports Illustrated's Kalyn Kahler[/a] and Albert Breer.
"[Rodgers changes plays] so often that it can be hard for McCarthy to get into a rhythm as the play caller," Kahler wrote. "McCarthy might call the same play three times in a game, without the play actually being run as he called it. And if McCarthy calls a play that Rodgers doesn’t like early in the game, that can sour the mood for the rest of the game."
Kahler and Breer both reported that the playcalling changes turned into a competition over who can call the better play.
"It’s almost ‘who’s got the better call?'" one anonymous coach told Breer. "Two really smart guys, ultra-competitive guys.”
A lack of talent on the roster, offseason coaching changes and a recent three-game skid further contributed to the Packers' decline. On Sunday, Packers executive Mark Murphy ultimately decided it was time to move on and get a head start on a coaching search.
The Packers are on track to miss the playoffs for the second straight season and for the first time with a healthy Rodgers since 2008. Joe Philbin will serve as the team's interim head coach for the remainder of the season.
That's hogwash. Then why is he losing this year?Nope go back and read what I said. I specifically mentioned that QBs matter more than ever, implying the era.
You're being dense if you don't at least acknowledge that a team can win with a great QB alone in today's NFL.
Rodgers has been winning in spite of McCarthy for years.
I seem to recall a lot of the same type of stuff swirling around Favre during his messy divorce from the Packers. Is it something the organization is doing, I wonder? But it sure seems like Rodgers might be a big part of the problem.Southpaw said:
Wouldn't be a part of new staff anyway and assured himself a job with M M if and when he gets one.