THis is something i did for another site. Just wondering what you guys thought. Just kind of summing up what i've been saying for a little while, and adding some of your thoughts to mine.
Also if i was wrong on anything please point it out (Ex. Do i have the conditional picks thing right?)
Also, keep in mind this is mainly to people who don't know much about the team.
Winning is not coming this year. And spending over 50 or so million isn't an option. We can't do like we always have, pay for free agents to come here so we can compete. Because, of the fact that we are still paying for 2001. We amassed so many differed contracts that we have to pay for now. So, we are in fact, paying for people not playing on this team.
Secondly on Richie Sexson, he definitly needs to be let go. It would be the smartest move we can make. If we throw more money at him to keep him, we again stall the rebuild process which is desperatly needed, and take away money from prospects we could sign. We made a mistake making that trade but don't sign him to justify the trade. You have no idea if he's going to be the same guy he once was after a shoulder injury like that. Also if we let him walk, it's not like we don't get anything. We get two first round draft picks! whats better then that? A team rebuilding gets two first round draft picks and save money by letting hte guy walk. We get the team who signs him first rounder, and we get another first round pick at the end of the 1st round.
Randy Johnson, he is going to give us a good bushel of prospects to pick and choose from. We loose 18 or so million dollars by trading a 41 year old starter. We can get money to 2 or so decent starters and, we improve our system greatly. We should be able to snag 2-3 good prospects for him. But i would rather trade him for one superstar prospect. Either way, if he's not traded this is going to be the biggest mistake in the history of the organization, even if he does go on to win a CY Young next season, it won't mean anything for a losing organization.
Our system in the offensive department is quite good. And we can easily build around them and be a good, young, cheap, team in 2006 or so. We have a star studded OF in the minors. Which includes the likes of Conor Jackson, Luis Terrero, Carlos Quinten, Josh Kroeger, along with others. And the Infield prospects aren't bad at all. Cintron is crap, but Stephen Drew, Sergio Santos, the teams #1 prospect for 2 years Scott Hairston also, and Now up in the Bigs Chad Tracy is very good.
Our pitching prospects are fairly weak however. With the Edgar Gonzalez experiment failed, we have a few decent pitching prospects left. Bill Murphy (Aquired in the shipment of Finley), Dustin Nippert (Guy can throw fast) Mike Gosling, and Adrian Rosario. No real stars. but decent 3-5 guys.
Which leads me onto the 2005 Amatuer Draft. Assuming we ship off Sexson, we should have around 3 first round picks. I would love for two of those to be spent on pitchers, considering how weak it is for us. I *Believe* we have the first pick in the draft, which excites me to no end. I love draft time and prospects. Favorite time of the year. And I'm hoping to read a lot about it. But my opinion on the first pick we have. Grab the best player available as long as there not an Outfielder unless it's the next Barry Bonds.
Sorry about the long read, just wanted you to know where I stand. And I pray this starts up a good convo, and hopefull those non-dback fans learn a little about the team.
Possible '06 Lineup:
C Hill
1B Conor Jackson (A Move to 1B would be good)
2B Scott Hairston (Hopefully he can figure out how to field)
SS Stephen Drew
3B Chad Tracy
LF Josh Kroeger?
CF Luis Terrero
RF Carlos Quinten