- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,867
- Reaction score
- 16,668
The deulsion that Bledsoe is at Irving's level is not shared by anyone outside of Bledsoe, his agent, and this board.
Cleveland had the 5th worst defensive rating when he was on the court and the 4th best when he was not on the court. Opposing players have in the neighborhood of an 18.5 PER against him. His numbers across the board are pretty much the same as when he entered the league and his team, despite his presence, continued to perform below expectations (they have won a total of 78 games during Kyrie's 3 year career).
Irving carries the label of a player who puts up impressive offensive stats but doesn't make his team better. Advanced stats say the opposite about Bledsoe. Offensively there isn't all that much difference between Kyrie and Eric. They are both better at getting their own shot than they are at creating offense for teammates. Irving is a little better at it than Bledsoe but not by much. Defensively, there is no comparison. Irving is Hardenesque on defense.
Here's an anonymous quote from a Western Conference Scout, taken from RealGM:
I think Kyrie is Stephon Marbury. Marbury was a great talent, too, but he never won. Steph was a pain in the butt, and Kyrie's not like that. He's not malicious. He's smart, he's more polished than Marbury. He's got the commercials and he's an engaging personality, but engaging only takes you so far. I really think he's just a scorer, and that's what Steph was. Kyrie can do whatever he wants to. He's got the ball on a string, he can get in the lane whenever he wants, but so far, he's chosen just to be a scorer rather than getting other guys involved. Guys say he doesn't trust his teammates, but you're talking about Luol Deng and Tristan Thompson. Those are good players. I'm just not buying into Kyrie.
Steve