Yes. Not everyone who asks for rational thinking is slinslin.
I asked a question and you answered, it's that easy. I'm not seeing all these posts heaping praise on Tyler Johnson that have your panties in a bunch though. No one is talking about him being the second coming of Nash or even the PG of the future but apparently saying he's not a great shooter is too much for you to handle after a good win? Ok, that seems odd.
The reason I asked if you saw the game though is because of your comment about Johnson played
no role in the Warriors shooting poorly from 3. He was crowding Steph, or whoever he was assigned to, as much as he could. What more is he or any defender supposed to do against the Warriors? So maybe any competent guard could do what he did, is that your point? Because the Suns haven't had a competent guard next to Booker since Bledsoe was dealt until they acquired Tyler. Is it too much to call him competent also? I'd say he's competent and I feel pretty comfortable I'm not alone in thinking that, even if I am I'm more than willing to debate that point if needed.
Someone has an excrement fetish.
Have you turned into BC? Can't get through a post without commenting on my user name, the one I didn't come up with. Ok, I thought you were more mature than that but whatever, my mistake.
What I objected to was the multiple posts saying things like "Johnson isn't the greatest shooter." The high of a big win isn't a license to spout nonsense.
Where are these multiple posts and what is nonsense about what was said? Is it nonsense he wasn't insulted more or that his other shortcomings weren't pointed out? You replied to A post that gave him some credit for how the team has played better with him here and you haven't even tried refuting anything that was posted. You seriously took exception to someone saying "I know he's the not the greatest shooter" and lost it because of that. Everyone knows he can't shoot, or he hasn't been able to as a Sun at least. Where is the nonsense? I'm yet to see it. Is it too much that someone made a post giving him some credit without harping on his shortcomings? I guess it is for you. No one stated he's having a Nash like impact on this team. All that I took from that post was what I've also seen, the Suns look better with Johnson on the team because they don't need to play G-Leaguers next to Booker as much anymore. Not only have the Suns been more entertaining to watch but they're also squeaking out some wins against good teams with gritty defense, that Johnson has contributed to.
This team still has a huge hole at PG, and if we're going to talk about their future, I see no advantage in glossing over that.
No one was claiming he's the answer long term or that he should start next year, if you saw that I'd like for you to point it out because I've gone over this thread and I can't find that. We are stuck with him and most everyone knows it. I think there is less a sense of urgency to get him off the roster then there was when we acquired him but I didn't see anyone claim the search is over for a PG. Talk changed quickly in this thread to signing D'Angelo Russell and last I checked I don't think anyone has ever confused him for Tyler Johnson or vice versa. I really don't know what you saw people claiming but I've gone through this thread a couple of times and unless it's from one of the 2 people I have blocked, and I highly doubt it was it either of them, then I don't see these posts talking about Tyler Johnson as the long term answer to our PG woes.