pokerface
ASFN Addict
- Joined
- May 20, 2004
- Posts
- 5,369
- Reaction score
- 807
1) We need Bell
2) The Hawks wouldn't want Bell
2) The Hawks wouldn't want Bell
So what kind of gamblers are you?
What would you give Atlanta right now to remove their protection on the pick?
I'd strongly consider giving them the two first round picks this year, plus a future 1st--and that could be for nothing.
No way in hell Atlanta agrees to remove the protection on the pick unless the Phoenix Suns offered more than they would ever consider truly offering. It just wouldn't happen.
In other words, there is the very real possibility that this could be another of a very very disappointing string of Phoenix Suns drafts.
The good news is that we will know by May 22.
can't the suns get/sign a good european/foreign PG? is there an available?
Good advanced tanking move. They play Boston tomorrow night and it would have been hard to lose with Smith playing.Josh Smith suspended two games for tirade against Mike Woodson.
Josh Smith suspended two games for tirade against Mike Woodson.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2830897
The Bucks have countered in the tank competition by shutting down Michael Redd for the rest of the year...Josh Smith suspended two games for tirade against Mike Woodson.
I think it also might be interesting to discuss what players Phoenix may select with their other two first round picks (if they should not get the Atlanta pick). Anyone high on players that Phoenix might select in these draft positions and would Phoenix keep both picks in this scenario?
I've already said it a few times, but I really want Darren Collison at 29.
Just re-looked at it. I think overall it's best to be in the #5 slot pre-lottery. So maybe Atlanta can pass either Sacto, Seattle, or Portland.
I'm no math whiz but I crunched the numbers a different way to show why fourth best record is the best place to be in and ALSO to show a lessor known fact that third worst record is better than fifth worst record.
3rd worst record
odds getting #1, #2 or #3 are 46.9%
odds getting #4 or #5 are 49.1%
odds getting #6 are 4.0%
4th worst record
odds getting #1, #2 or #3 are 37.8%
odds getting #4 or #5 are 60.9%
odds getting #6 are 1.2%
5th worst record
odds getting #1, #2 or #3 are 29.1%
odds getting #4 are 0.0%
odds getting #5, #6 or #7 are 70.6%
So what does this all mean?
Well with the 4th worst record we have a 62% chance of cashing in on that pick....and the picks are real good at the #4 and #5 spots. So we have a better than even chance of getting great picks.
The 3rd worst record isnt so bad because we still have a 53% chance of collecting on the pick....plus if we collect the picks are in a very good range of 4-6 (49% chance of getting #4 or #5). If we have to gamble thats not such a bad place to be in.
Now the 5th worst record I have a problem with. True there is only a 29% chance of cracking the top three with it but the odds arn't so small that it can be discounted. We have ZERO chance of getting the 4th pick which really blows. There is a 62% chance of getting the #5 or #6 which I guess is the safer but not so glamorous road to travel on. Then there is a 8% chance of getting #7 which is not so small it cant be discounted.
I just think by taking on a little additional risk the rewards are so much greater with the 3rd worst record than the 5th worst record. 4th worst record is best of both worlds IMO.