This is ridiculous. You've posted here since early 2020, and guys like Stout, Ouchie, Cheese, Chopper and myself have been here for ~18 years prior (as have others like Krang). Do you think we'd still be here if we weren't positive at some points? If we didn't want the team to win?
We love this team. We've seen how terrible it can be. We've endured through our fandom. I'd imagine that not one of us questioned the Cards roster in 2015, or stopped to question the team in our 2008 run.
I'll tell you, I can't wait to get to a new coach and GM combo, because you'll hear nothing but hope from me, barring completely dumb hires. It's half a decade of a playoff drought. We're exhausted. We're spending our money on something that has stopped returning joy. Everything seems like a mess.
Maybe he "doubts everything at length" so he doesn't overinvest. I'd rather be pleasantly surprised than have my dreams shattered.
Firstly, I'm not questioning your fandom or
@Stout or anyone else. Despite
@Ouchie-Z-Clown putting words in my mouth. In fact, I like and appreciate all 3 of you. Although I'm not sure how long or recent someone's membership here has a baring on how right or wrong they are.
Like people, fans come in all flavors and there are some here that are relentlessly negative beyond all reason. I've defended and supported you several times on here, but this off season has been tedious.
Not over investing so you are "pleasantly surprised" is a neutral position. That's not what you do. You endlessly complain about everything and telling others how they are wrong to be positive. It's draining.
My point to
@Stout was that it's EASY to never put yourself out there except on things everyone agrees on. Hudson was a good signing, "I was happy we drafted Rosen". Next you will be telling me you liked the Nuk and Chandler Jones trades.
But it seem's to me that unless it's a surefire, no brainer positive move you're going to be negative about it, and tell everyone else why they should be negative about it, until proven otherwise.
I have no problem with negative opinions when there are clearly issues that deserve being negative about, but there are also things that could go either way and 100% of the time if it's in the balance you always choose negative.
How about you stick your neck out now and again and say "I think this player/trade/draft pick is going to be good" based on nothing but a little knowledge and some blind faith?
I'll do some now because it does no harm.
I think Jordan Hicks is going to have a better year.
I think Chritian Kirk is a solid WR that can do much more and has been badly used. He will have an ascending year and 850+ yards.
I think Marco Wilson will struggle at first as most rookie CB's do but by year end he will be solidified as the future CB1
I think Zaven, while not in the DROTY conversation, will have a good year with a PFF grade over 65. (Devin White was 51 as a rookie)
I think Robert Alford, if he stays healthy, will be a solid starter. Better than most we had at CB lately. Judging him on his last year at the Falcons is silly.
I think while we likely lose on Sunday I don't think it's as foregone as some think. It will be a close game and come down to a turnover or a single stalled drive either way.
But also I don't think we have more than 7 wins. I don't think Kliff vastly improves and I think next off season we are looking for a new HC, but sadly not GM. I'm playing the odds here more than anything. I do think Kliff his smart, he just hasn't shown much of it in games so far. His NFL career has been much like his college career and I don't see that suddenly changing. His record against winning teams is poor, and I think we play a lot of winning teams this year. And Mikey's arm is too far inside Steve Keim to be detached now.