It's so surprising to learn that a head coach does better with a HOF caliber quarterback on his team.
Steve
It's equally surprising that good coaches can have a
winning record WITHOUT an HOF QB. See Alex Smith and Jim Harbaugh. Flacco and the other Harbaugh. Schaub and Kubiak. Cutler and Smith. Hell, Ponder and Frazier this year.
Your fallacy is that you're framing it as Whiz having a BETTER record with an HOF qb. The point isn't that, but that
Whiz has only a decent record with one, and a losing record without one. 18-25 does not equal keeping your job in the NFL. Only among Cardinals fans would 18-25 be an HC's record worth defending.
As I said, what's surprising is that it took an HOF QB to get Whiz a mere ONE and TWO games above .500. Imagine what the Ravens, Niners, Texans or even Bears would do with '08-'09 Warner throwing the ball.
And for that matter, why were we only 9-7 and 10-6 with Warner? Why did he retire?
That's right, because we still had the worst OL in the league. Whiz, Grimm and Graves' fault.