clif
ASFN Addict
Lex said:Clif, Clif, Clif.
We don't know if DB smoked crack.
ok ok.... snorting right?
come on... seriously.. WHATEVER he was doing.... it was not the cards fault..
Lex said:Clif, Clif, Clif.
We don't know if DB smoked crack.
kerouac9 said:Thomas Jones compiled 162 total yards in an offense spearheaded by some guy named Jonathan Quinn who passed for 65 yards. That performance is a testament in itself for his ability.
The kid's 25 years old and never been given more than 140 rushing attempts in a season. He toted the rock more times in a part-time role (starting only the last handful of games of the season) in Tampa than he ever did in Arizona.
Thomas Jones and Michael Pittman posted virtually identical per-carry stats when they were playing together. Pittman was given the starting job over and over because Arizona fans hated Jones and Mac yielded to the pressure. Once Thomas Jones left Arizona, his per-carry average increased by a full yard. The numbers speak for themselves.
It's funny that Mac and his staff's futility only extend to their inability to develop Jake Plummer as a legitimate, average starting NFL quarterback. Apparently, they had no job developing an obvious talent in Thomas Jones or maintaining discipline with another obvious talent like David Boston.
Canuck Cardinal said:Smokin' crack, boozing, etc are all symptoms of poor interest !
These guys were top notch athletes that were all promised the starring role... only to find out they were lied to once training camp started... no one including the fans could tell you definitively who the team offensive identity was.
In dealing with young studs, that were all the focus of their team in college, a clear role in the Cardinals offense should and needs to be enforced. This is the discipline that we lacked with the old coaching regime.
Duckjake said:Do you really believe that there have been enough Cardinal fans since '99 to actually put pressure on anybody? We couldn't put pressure on anyone if we all gathered at mid-field and piled on top of them.
Russ Smith said:That's one of the oldest and least convincing arguments though. Good RB's break long runs, to subtract out the long runs is just not fair.
There are very few guys who play behind a line as good as Emmit's line was in Dallas where they can get 4 YPC. Droughns is doing it right now in Denver, of course Carolina and Oakland also happen to have HUGE problems stopping the run right now, Carolina due to injuries, Oakland because it's clear they overpaid for 2 past their prime DT's and aren't getting much bang for their buck in return. I watched the entire game and they said Sapp's name twice, and once was to mention they hadn't called his name very often.
Most RB's HAVE to break long runs to be effective. Jones had his problems here, it's apparent he didn't want to be here, it's also apparent we weren't using him the way he needed to be used to be effective.
Pariah said:That may be, but if you've seen TJ play in Chicago this year you know that while he is finding some holes, he's also breaking tackles--something he never did in AZ. He's tough to bring down this year whereas when he was with us he was tough to keep on his feet.
He's playing different now than he played with us and I don't think it's because of the line--he's finally living up to his pre-draft billing.
Lex said:First off, I was born in the moose capital of the north 46 years ago. Second, my brother-in-law is from Ontario ...
So what's your point?
Frankly, anyone with the audacity to defend Thomas Jones and David Boston on an Arizona Cardinals message board
nevermind.
Lex said:Crazy Canuck-
Yes, you may.
Then I'd say "in a hospital."
But what you want to know is, northwestern Minnesota, pretty much straight south of the Peg in Manitoba. My brother-in-law is from Thunder Bay.
Iv'e been in AZ for about 20 years.
Skkorpion said:Hasn't TJ had only one super game but averaged less than 3 yds a carry in the other 4? Same crap he showed here.
RugbyMuffin said:Agreed!
This guy has a few good games, and now he is an All-Pro?
Give me a friggin' break (and not my hand ).
He stinks as bad as he ever did. Yes, he has speed, but he still dances in the hole, and his attitude is more than questionable.
If he does well with the Bears..great! But I still wouldn't want him back here.
kerouac9 said:Thomas Jones is 13th among rushers in the NFL right now. He has more yards than Marshall Faulk (who ran all over the Cards, BTW), Fred Taylor, and Kevan Barlow. He has one less rushing yard than Shaun Alexander. He has one game where he's failed to accrue more than 100 yards of total offense.
No one's saying his an All-Pro, but I'd rather have him back than any of the RBs currently on the roster, active or not. And I bet Denny Green would, too.
buff17 said:Huge difference considering all year all teams have did is put 8 in the box to stop him. Defenses dared to make Grossman and Quinn beat them. Rex at least had a shot, Quinn is the worst "starting" QB I have ever seen. BTW, the Bears receivers are awful as well.
Lex, have you watched Jones at all this year? He's not the same guy that would fall over when defenders looked at him--he's running very, very well.Lex said:Thomas "hold the phone" Jones--4.4 ypc.
Emmitt Smith--4.2 ypc.
MY GOD what a difference!
Maybe this isn't aimed at me, but since I was last to post I'll respond anyway. When we first drafted Jones, I was like a lot of us in thinking that he could be something special. Then he floundered for a couple of years and generally sucked eggs. I was glad to see him go.swd1974 said:Never thought Id see the day when Thomas Jones is heralded as the next coming of something great and then have posters say I told you so.
Maybe you can hide in the fact that it was so long ago, but I cant name one poster who said, after several TJ starts, this man is something special.
WildBB said:This guy is still only 25 this being his fourth yr. It's safe to say the org. had not enough patience to bring him along. The talent along the OL was also questionable. In fairness, in TB TJ showed more promise and even they failed to see it.