Catfish
Registered
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Posts
- 4,551
- Reaction score
- 64
In the first underground podcast of the regular season, Ron Wolfley said that he would be disappointed if the Cards lost to the Rams. My first thought was that Wolf, (who is known for being bold and brash), was going way out on a limb here. Then I realized, that I too would be disappointed if the Cards lost to the Rams on Sunday-----but that in no way is an indicator that I believe the Cards win this game.
Without going back to listen to the podcast again, I am not sure that Wolf actually said the believed the Cards would win. I just don't recall him saying that. I did hear him say, (at the very end of the podcast), that he would be disappointed if they lost. So would I.
My point for this post is, that a person cannot always assume that because someone says one thing, that you can automatically turn that statement around, claiming that he indicated the opposite. I sure don't feel confident enough to predict a win over the Rams, but at the same time I would be disappointed with a loss to them. In this case, 'six of one', is not quite the same as 'a half dozen of the other'. I guess we can all be more careful about how we respond to one's statements.
Without going back to listen to the podcast again, I am not sure that Wolf actually said the believed the Cards would win. I just don't recall him saying that. I did hear him say, (at the very end of the podcast), that he would be disappointed if they lost. So would I.
My point for this post is, that a person cannot always assume that because someone says one thing, that you can automatically turn that statement around, claiming that he indicated the opposite. I sure don't feel confident enough to predict a win over the Rams, but at the same time I would be disappointed with a loss to them. In this case, 'six of one', is not quite the same as 'a half dozen of the other'. I guess we can all be more careful about how we respond to one's statements.