Evil Ash said:So grabbing somebody by the balls and then yanking isn't suspendable but hitting the neck is. Now there's a precedent for you
That should have been a suspension.
Evil Ash said:So grabbing somebody by the balls and then yanking isn't suspendable but hitting the neck is. Now there's a precedent for you
D-Dogg said:I was at the game and it looked disgusting. I'm watching it on the DVR right now, and just watched it at game speed.
That's a suspension. No doubt. Absolute cheap shot with no remorse.
sly fly said:Did you see Kwame's 'bow? That's a "suspendable" offense. But, the NBA chose to ignore it.
The NBA set a precedent by letting Kwame get away with it.
Fast forward to Bell's meltdown tonight.
How can the NBA suspend Bell, but not Kwame?
You can't be picking and choosing. If an elbow is thrown upstairs, a player is maliciously clotheslined, or someone's getting their balls grabbed... you have to remain consistent with the suspensions.
D-Dogg said:That should have been a suspension.
sly fly said:Did you see Kwame's 'bow? That's a "suspendable" offense. But, the NBA chose to ignore it.
The NBA set a precedent by letting Kwame get away with it.
Fast forward to Bell's meltdown tonight.
How can the NBA suspend Bell, but not Kwame?
You can't be picking and choosing. If an elbow is thrown upstairs, a player is maliciously clotheslined, or someone's getting their balls grabbed... you have to remain consistent with the suspensions.
Evil Ash said:So grabbing somebody by the balls and then yanking isn't suspendable but hitting the neck is. Now there's a precedent for you
Evil Ash said:I loved the remorse Kwame showed after he elbowed Diaw
Yuma said:I think Raja gets a suspension. I also think it will cost the Suns the series.
MaoTosiFanClub said:Seriously, if you can't see a difference between the Walton and Brown flagrants and what Bell did tonight then you are either really dumb or really myopic. And I don't think too many people on this board are dumb.
Elbows and hard fouls are a part of basketball and definitely a part of playoff basketball. Clotheslining and smacks across the head while not attempting to play defense is not a part of basketball.
Ryanwb said:I don't think there was a precident for grabbing a guy's *****. I think the NBA was like, "look Dennis Rodman went his whole career without a crotch grab so we really didn't plan for this"
Evil Ash said:I loved the remorse Kwame showed after he elbowed Diaw
mribnik said:I don't see it that way. In fact, I think Bell's defense on Kobe is overrated in the context of this series. For one, we have a few other capable defenders to put on Kobe (JR and Marion). Also, if Kobe goes off in Bell's absense, so what? He went off on us in the regular season and it didn't help the Lakers much. The Lakers have been successful sticking to their gameplan. Kobe could score 40 on Bell if he wanted to this series, but the Lakers probably would've lost those games.
The Suns would miss bell though, if he's suspended, because he's a good player on an injury riddled team. We need as many able bodies as we can get.
MaoTosiFanClub said:Seriously, if you can't see a difference between the Walton and Brown flagrants and what Bell did tonight then you are either really dumb or really myopic. And I don't think too many people on this board are dumb.
Elbows and hard fouls are a part of basketball and definitely a part of playoff basketball. Clotheslining and smacks across the head while not attempting to play defense is not a part of basketball.
D-Dogg said:Not to his neck...
Kwame's foul and Bell's aren't even in the same area code. Bell's was as bad as Kobe's elbow to Miller, and more so because he hit him AGAIN in the face as he was going down.
Don't be myopic.
SirChaz said:Nice post up until the point you played mind reader.
Raja said he just lost his head a little and admitted it was a mistake.
I don't think he tried to hurt anyone. He meant to foul him hard and did.
As soon as Raja doesn't follow through Kobe makes it an and 1.
Bell's foul was more flagrant but Waltons came closer to hurting someone.
Because you're trying to suggest that because the NBA set a precedent on the Brown/Walton flagrants that the same precedent applies to Bell. Unfortunately, they're not the same things so the Brown/Walton precedent is irrelevant.sly fly said:Give me a friggin break. Kobe was laughing. He wasn't in pain.
Some of you guys are overreacting. It's playoff basketball for chrissakes.
I'm not defending what Raja did. All I said was the NBA set a precedent. How can you not understand that?
MaoTosiFanClub said:But you are right the NBA did set a precedent when it comes to going for a guy's neck without trying for the ball. It was a two game suspension and it was handed out to Kobe earlier this year for his cheap shot on Mike Miller.
Don't you have some kind of league meeting to attend?tlim said:waaah waaah waaah
MaoTosiFanClub said:Because you're trying to suggest that because the NBA set a precedent on the Brown/Walton flagrants that the same precedent applies to Bell. Unfortunately, they're not the same things so the Brown/Walton precedent is irrelevant.
But you are right the NBA did set a precedent when it comes to going for a guy's neck without trying for the ball. It was a two game suspension and it was handed out to Kobe earlier this year for his cheap shot on Mike Miller.
cheesebeef said:well, everyone's referring to him standing over him afterward - it was an elbow, down low and a hard foul, but a bordeline suspension call - it wasn't an arm around the throat, predmeditated - ah, screw it - there was a reason I stopped reading and posting here - a total lack of objectivity.
Go Suns.
tlim said:As Raja has said, and you have quoted:
He lost his mind. In other words, it was clearly premeditated before that play.
So I'm not mind reading. I'm just stating what Raja said. Raja lost his mind and was really angry. Decided well before the play to clothesline him (intent), and to do hurt him in some way.
So no, I'm not trying to mind read. Raja basically admitted that that was what he did.
Don't forget, even Ron Artest said, "he lost his mind" during that brawl, and was apologetic. It doesn't matter, as the clear intent was there to harm.
He'll be booted for at least 1 game or perhaps 2 games.
Like Kenny said, if he wasn't suspended for some amount of time, that type of play can happen at the end of games to hurt the other player. Clothesline because you're pissed. You say you lost your head a little, apologize, and then get off with a small fine. That would take basketball back to the 80s, and early 90s, with ugly ball, and clothesline everywhere.
What if that happened to Nash, Diaw, or Tim Thomas? A clothesline by Ronny Turiaf to send Nash sprawling to the ground? No suspension for him?