fordronken
Registered User
You're kidding about Allan Henderson, right?
cheesebeef said:the reason I really don'tlike any major trades this offseason is that it sets us up as Dallas/Trailblazers Part II - The Blazers were so close to beating the Lakers and then they kept adding and subtracting players to make a team that had gone to the Conference Finals 2 years in a row a laughingstock of the league. Dallas continues to play musical chairs with their roster and it hasn't done squat for them either.
This isn't the offseason to panic and just start trading guys away - especially considering the undeniable chemistry on the team. If they get whupped again in the WCF next year then yeah - start tinkering - but give this group - with hopefully some depth more than one year together. Get some vets on the club - mix it up and give it another run. We were basicaly playing with 6 guys all season long - HUnter was and IS a marginal player out there and don't even get me starte don Barbosa at this point. When you compare those two guys with guys like Robert Horry, Brent Barry and Rasho Nesterivic or Antonio McDyess and Lindsay Hunter - it's easy to see why those teams (The Spurs and the Pistons) beat us and the Heat. Experience and depth are the keys for our club in the future - we got a nice dose of experience this year - this offseason is where hopefully we compliment that with some depth.
cheesebeef said:the reason I really don'tlike any major trades this offseason is that it sets us up as Dallas/Trailblazers Part II - The Blazers were so close to beating the Lakers and then they kept adding and subtracting players to make a team that had gone to the Conference Finals 2 years in a row a laughingstock of the league. Dallas continues to play musical chairs with their roster and it hasn't done squat for them either.
This isn't the offseason to panic and just start trading guys away - especially considering the undeniable chemistry on the team. If they get whupped again in the WCF next year then yeah - start tinkering - but give this group - with hopefully some depth more than one year together. Get some vets on the club - mix it up and give it another run. We were basicaly playing with 6 guys all season long - HUnter was and IS a marginal player out there and don't even get me starte don Barbosa at this point. When you compare those two guys with guys like Robert Horry, Brent Barry and Rasho Nesterivic or Antonio McDyess and Lindsay Hunter - it's easy to see why those teams (The Spurs and the Pistons) beat us and the Heat. Experience and depth are the keys for our club in the future - we got a nice dose of experience this year - this offseason is where hopefully we compliment that with some depth.
George O'Brien said:From what I can tell, Mark Cuban is calling the shots in Dallas these days. He has put together a talented team but doesn't really have a plan for solving their biggest problem - Dirk cannot defend. Amare doesn't know how, but has the ability to be pretty good. Dirk simply cannot defend and their team is built around him.
sunsfn said:There is no doubt that the suns need a stronger bench. But the problems with Dallas over the years is not the changing of the players as much as needing an inside presence and never finding it.
The suns have their inside presence with Amare, and now are going to try to find the pieces to go with him. If they think there is a player or two out there that they can get with a trade, I think they will do it.
Amare is a beast and gives the suns a great chance to go all the way next year if they can find a couple players to strengthen this team.
-
playstation said:if the players you have aren't capable of winning a title, then more years together won't help them in their quest. the suns are awesome, and are only going to get better. unfortunately, shawn marion will not get better by growing 3 inches. this poses a problem within our current style of play, because the best post players will take advantage of this, either by drawing double teams or rebounds. i think this suns team is capable of winning a title, but only if shawn marion plays the 3 position. this means we need somebody to come in and play the 4 or 5, but this is not easy (or cheap) to find. imo, hence the trade rumors.
i don't really care whether a trade goes down or not, as long as i get to watch amare come back and become even more of a freak show.
cheesebeef said:the reason I really don'tlike any major trades this offseason is that it sets us up as Dallas/Trailblazers Part II - The Blazers were so close to beating the Lakers and then they kept adding and subtracting players to make a team that had gone to the Conference Finals 2 years in a row a laughingstock of the league. Dallas continues to play musical chairs with their roster and it hasn't done squat for them either.
This isn't the offseason to panic and just start trading guys away - especially considering the undeniable chemistry on the team. If they get whupped again in the WCF next year then yeah - start tinkering - but give this group - with hopefully some depth more than one year together. Get some vets on the club - mix it up and give it another run. We were basicaly playing with 6 guys all season long - HUnter was and IS a marginal player out there and don't even get me starte don Barbosa at this point. When you compare those two guys with guys like Robert Horry, Brent Barry and Rasho Nesterivic or Antonio McDyess and Lindsay Hunter - it's easy to see why those teams (The Spurs and the Pistons) beat us and the Heat. Experience and depth are the keys for our club in the future - we got a nice dose of experience this year - this offseason is where hopefully we compliment that with some depth.
JCSunsfan said:From what I can tell, Brian Colangelo is calling the shots in Phoenix these days. He has put together a talented team but doesn't really have a plan for solving their biggest problem - Nash cannot defend. Amare doesn't know how, but has the ability to be pretty good. Nash simply cannot defend and their team is dependent upon him.
Its important to be realistic.
JPlay said:I like Dalembert, Chandler and Kwame Brown out of the list of FA. Those are young athletic guys who can be shot blocker/rebounders.
thegrahamcrackr said:I would like Dalembert or Chandler, but of course all three are RFAs and an MLE contract (if we could get them to sign it) would be matched in a heartbeat.
JPlay said:Yeah, but we have an edge. His name is Steve Nash.
cheesebeef said:so the Bulls and Sixers will be afraid to match the contract because of what Steve Nash will do to them?
It's not about those guys signing here - it's about the right to match superceding our offer from the home team.
elindholm said:I think the final question about this trade has to be this: Which nickname is cooler, The Matrix or AK-47? Those are definitely two of the better nicknames out there among current NBA players. If the Suns are going to make a lateral move as far as talent is concerned, they should at least gain an advantage in the nickname department.
JPlay said:I like Dalembert, Chandler and Kwame Brown out of the list of FA. Those are young athletic guys who can be shot blocker/rebounders.
coloradosun said:Don't compare the Suns to the Mavs, compare them to the Spurs. There are only 4 players on the current Spurs roster from the 2003 championship team. Ginobli, Parker, Duncan and Bowen. Their core is only 4 players and they let Speedy Claxton, Stephan Jackson, Steve Smith, Kevin Willis, Danny Ferry move on. Robinson and Kerr retired. They were stuck with a huge contract in Malik Rose who they converted into Mohamad, who eventually supplanted Nesterovic.
That situation looks very similar to what the Suns have now. You have to determine the 4 core players or do they go with only 3. Do they stick with Marion as the fourth or do they move him. Do they hang on to Q and have that 5th long term contract bogging them down like Malik Rose's did. 5 long term contracts put a damper on the flexibility to add components like the Spurs did to get them back to the finals with only 4 players from a championship team.
If, I say if, they make this trade Marion/Q for AK47, he would probably be considered the 4th that they build around. It is probably in their best interests to cut their long term commitments down to 4, then they will be able to add the veterans such as a Horry, Barry who want to win championships.
DevonCardsFan said:Dalambert is my #1 guy, I wan't. He would fit the Suns perfect, a front court with Amare, Marion and Dalambert all can rebound, blockshots, very athletic and can run the break!! Dalembert would be perfect
coloradosun said:If, I say if, they make this trade Marion/Q for AK47, he would probably be considered the 4th that they build around. It is probably in their best interests to cut their long term commitments down to 4, then they will be able to add the veterans such as a Horry, Barry who want to win championships.
elindholm said:Marion for Dalembert + Korver.
Since you and I are the only members of the "Maybe the Suns should trade Marion even though we like him" club, let me reiterate that I'd hold out for Stojakovic and Skinner. Dalembert and Korver for Marion is a ripoff. Dalembert has "potential," but he hasn't shown anything consistent yet, and just to say that the coach "didn't like him" isn't an explanation for why he couldn't keep himself on the floor. Of course, Skinner's no better in that regard, but the difference is that you are getting a premium scorer in the same package. Korver is borderline worthless. Sure, it's nice to have someone who can make three-pointers, but he also has to bring other things to the table, and Korver doesn't.