Kyler Murray Debate Thread

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,693
Reaction score
41,488
Location
UK
I'm still in. Just on the down low. There's no point to getting in front of the freight train of anti-Murray sentiment on the board. Just ducking my head in for a moment to declare my allegiance.

That K1 choked on Sunday doesn't mean for certain he won't be successful here in ARZ. He still has next year. There's a non-zero chance he comes back better in 2025, despite any assertions to the contrary.

But, by all means, don't let me stop the funeral procession for Murray's tenure as the Cardinals' QB1.

Please continue with your eulogies and obituaries.

Come on man, not a "There's always next year post". We've had "Kyler will be better next year" posts every year since 2019.

He is what he is. He's a mid level QB with the talent to be great in spells that is missing something that enables him to be able to apply it consistently.

He regularly gets outplayed by QB's that he is supposed to be more talented than. See Geno Smith.
 

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,746
Reaction score
1,049
Location
Rhode Island
I said it before and I will say it again Jake Plummer had a better career with the cards than Kyler. He won a playoff game which is what matters. They are both sub .500 QBs with the team so what else is there to care about.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,350
Reaction score
11,442
What are the options if we move on? This does not look like an enticing QB class. If we cut him the dead cap hit chews up the majority of our open cap.

The only free agent QB who might be an upgrade is Sam Darnold and I don't want to be the team that overpays him.

He's maddeningly inconsistent, he can't play effectively with any physical limitation, his pouty sideline face is back in full force... but I think we're locked into another year.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
64,030
Reaction score
30,124
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
All during his recovery from his injury there were reports on how he was putting in the physical work and being complemented for it

I praised him for putting in the hard work

I also stated many times that he needed to be working on reading a defense with film and practice and that's the hard work that would make a difference for him

I got questioned about how did I know he wasn't, but stayed strong on my convictions that the mental part would be his key and this was a good time to hone his game

When you have limitations (height) you need to find ways to over come that

Look how much work Warner did and how it showed during the games

He knew where every receiver was supposed to be on every play so when he his first option was covered he knew where and how to throw the progressions

So the question is would this help him in tight games and under pressure?

My answer is yes

Can KM still put it together with him going back to his bad habits?

If he could learn to read the defense better I believe it would help him to be more consistent which is what we all want for him to do
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,083
Reaction score
24,525
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
1) What does “can’t get it done” mean? I think Kyler can make the NFC Championship game with proper talent around him, and our current cap and draft situation makes that possible. Disappointing he yakked in ANOTHER playoff qualifier, but this team also lags in talent.
All evidence to the contrary. What in the world gives you that belief other than blind hope?
 

GeorgiaCard88

Veteran
Joined
Jan 10, 2023
Posts
441
Reaction score
1,194
Location
Georgia
I'm still in. Just on the down low. There's no point to getting in front of the freight train of anti-Murray sentiment on the board. Just ducking my head in for a moment to declare my allegiance.

That K1 choked on Sunday doesn't mean for certain he won't be successful here in ARZ. He still has next year. There's a non-zero chance he comes back better in 2025, despite any assertions to the contrary.

But, by all means, don't let me stop the funeral procession for Murray's tenure as the Cardinals' QB1.

Please continue with your eulogies and obituaries.
C'mon crimson, you shouldn't wear white to a funeral.

I hope we move on, but if we don't, here is to hoping you are right
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,732
Reaction score
41,673
Location
Colorado
You’re right. I was one of those. I can admit when I’m wrong.
It’s less that and more about the quality of this rookie QB class. The idea of spending a 1st on the 3rd best QB in this draft class is awful to me. Also, I have no idea about the ability of Petzing to develop a QB unlike KOC and SP.
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
8,335
Reaction score
9,770
Location
Home of the Thunder
Come on man, not a "There's always next year post". We've had "Kyler will be better next year" posts every year since 2019.

He is what he is. He's a mid level QB with the talent to be great in spells that is missing something that enables him to be able to apply it consistently.

He regularly gets outplayed by QB's that he is supposed to be more talented than. See Geno Smith.

I hear what you're saying.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,590
Reaction score
30,272
Location
Gilbert, AZ
If Cards draft a QB for the future with a high draft pick how do you think Kyler will react? I don't see it being a positive one.
If we draft a QBotF high, who really cares how Kyler feels about it?

All evidence to the contrary. What in the world gives you that belief other than blind hope?

Because Brock Purdy and Jimmy Garappolo both started conference championship games
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,246
Reaction score
8,265
Location
Scottsdale
Because Brock Purdy and Jimmy Garappolo both started conference championship games
While clearly much less gifted, physically, I believe a strong case can be made that both Purdy and Jimmy G (particularly Purdy) are, or were in Jimmy G’s case, better “NFL QB’s” than Kyler Murray.
Both put in the time in the film room and as a result, are far more advanced in their ability to make the appropriate pre and post-snap reads than Kyler.
Additionally, both are significantly more capable of operating and executing from the pocket than Kyler.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,127
Reaction score
25,011
Location
Killjoy Central
While clearly much less gifted, physically, I believe a strong case can be made that both Purdy and Jimmy G (particularly Purdy) are, or were in Jimmy G’s case, better “NFL QB’s” than Kyler Murray.
Both put in the time in the film room and as a result, are far more advanced in their ability to make the appropriate pre and post-snap reads than Kyler.
Additionally, both are significantly more capable of operating and executing from the pocket than Kyler.
I think it is telling that Purdy started 46 games in college and Jimmy G. started 45 games in college.

Kyler started only 17 games in college.
 

BirdGangThing

Cultist
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
16,450
Reaction score
22,581
Location
Arcadia
geno smith "managed" that game - did nuthin spectacular - lot of dink and dunk - screens behind los - finding the shallow cushion between secondary and linebackers - no rushing yards - he read the defense - took what it gave him AND PROTECTED THE FOOTBALL

this was the difference in the game - one qb who learned from his mistakes and another still making rookie mistakes in year 5
 

602 Native

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
2,019
Reaction score
4,064
Location
Gilbert
While clearly much less gifted, physically, I believe a strong case can be made that both Purdy and Jimmy G (particularly Purdy) are, or were in Jimmy G’s case, better “NFL QB’s” than Kyler Murray.
Both put in the time in the film room and as a result, are far more advanced in their ability to make the appropriate pre and post-snap reads than Kyler.
Additionally, both are significantly more capable of operating and executing from the pocket than Kyler.
Laughable

Stacked teams with a great coach.

We saw Jimmy G outside that system and he is now a PEDs user on his way out of the league.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,239
Reaction score
23,708
While clearly much less gifted, physically, I believe a strong case can be made that both Purdy and Jimmy G (particularly Purdy) are, or were in Jimmy G’s case, better “NFL QB’s” than Kyler Murray.
Both put in the time in the film room and as a result, are far more advanced in their ability to make the appropriate pre and post-snap reads than Kyler.
Additionally, both are significantly more capable of operating and executing from the pocket than Kyler.
Jimmy G turned the ball over more times than he had TDs in both of his 3 game playoff-runs.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
16,102
Reaction score
8,136
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
All during his recovery from his injury there were reports on how he was putting in the physical work and being complemented for it

I praised him for putting in the hard work

I also stated many times that he needed to be working on reading a defense with film and practice and that's the hard work that would make a difference for him

I got questioned about how did I know he wasn't, but stayed strong on my convictions that the mental part would be his key and this was a good time to hone his game

When you have limitations (height) you need to find ways to over come that

Look how much work Warner did and how it showed during the games

He knew where every receiver was supposed to be on every play so when he his first option was covered he knew where and how to throw the progressions

So the question is would this help him in tight games and under pressure?

My answer is yes

Can KM still put it together with him going back to his bad habits?

If he could learn to read the defense better I believe it would help him to be more consistent which is what we all want for him to do
My thoughts are he can read a defense somewhat, he just can't process the information quick enough. It's always been the the divider between talented QBs and great QBs.
 

BirdGangThing

Cultist
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
16,450
Reaction score
22,581
Location
Arcadia
My thoughts are he can read a defense somewhat, he just can't process the information quick enough. It's always been the the divider between talented QBs and great QBs.
on the first drive we saw what i believed to be an an audible resulting in the td - i think @Harry disagreed but i recall kyler seeing the seahawks defense and changing the play at the line - i could be wrong and it's probably online somewhere but my point is he's able to recognize and compute - especially against a team he faced just 13 days prior

but it's the live action - there's two kyler murrays imo - the unstoppable and the easily stoppable and it all has to do with his comfort level - when he plays scared that's mistakes are made - but that's supposed to somewhat go away after idk? 5 or 6 years id hope? and when did he become so afraid to run with the freakin pigskin
 
Last edited:

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,650
Reaction score
14,954
He says he loves this scheme and has spoken enthusiastically about it many times. If he can't perform in a scheme he loves with coaches that strongly believe in him and have done everything they can for him to succeed, I just don't see how he might work elsewhere.

Drop him into a team with the best O line in the league and maybe, but what are the odds of that?
When the O-line was playing well, both in terms of protecting Kyler and opening up holes in the running game, Kyler was a much better performer. A shaky line with Kyler is a bad combination - his #'s under pressure of late have been a disaster.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,029
Reaction score
70,077
When the O-line was playing well, both in terms of protecting Kyler and opening up holes in the running game, Kyler was a much better performer. A shaky line with Kyler is a bad combination - his #'s under pressure of late have been a disaster.
And therein lies the rub… Kyler needs pretty much perfect conditions to be successful and even when he is… it’s only against bad teams.

Every good QB has to deal with adversity against good teams and overcome them. Mid QBs can’t. And that’s what separates the “men from the boys” at the position in the league.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,650
Reaction score
14,954
And therein lies the rub… Kyler needs pretty much perfect conditions to be successful and even when he is… it’s only against bad teams.

Every good QB has to deal with adversity against good teams and overcome them. Mid QBs can’t. And that’s what separates the “men from the boys” at the position in the league.
Yeah, only being good when everything is perfect, and never stepping up in one big game in 6 years is not a great formula for success.
 
Top