Absolute Zero said:Unbelievable that you guys are still talking about trading Marion, right in the middle of the playoffs, even after his 32 pt. 19 reb, Cassel shut down performance last night.
Don't be hatin', get on board the Marion bandwagon
BC867 said:-- With Amare returning next year, and the emergence of Boris Diaw, it's going to be too crowded for The Matrix to be anything more than a supporting player. And if it means that we can then afford Tim Thomas, we'll be a stronger team (especially in the playoffs) for it.
Gaddabout said:How do you move Marion's salary without taking an equal salary in return while creating cap room for Thomas?
BC867 said:Scottie Pippin was nothing more than average when he and Michael were no longer together.
I would do that in a heart beat....WastedFate said:Marion, Barbosa, ATL #1, Phx #1
For
Garnett
Get it done in the offseason fellas.
elindholm said:Trade Marion for KG? IMHO, this sounds like a fan trade rather than a serious proposal.
What is that supposed to mean? NBA general managers don't participate on this board, so every single hypothetical trade that is ever discussed is a "fan trade."
Several posters have provided abundant reasoning for why the proposed trade might be realistic, and you choose to disregard it without saying why. Instead, you chime in every week or so with a drive-by dismissal, then run away again. So I challenge you again to answer the following questions:
1. Why is Minnesota certain to hang onto Garnett this summer, when it's obvious their franchise is going nowhere and he's miserable?
2. Who is going to pony up a better offer than Marion, Barbosa, and the two Joe Johnson picks?
elindholm said:So are you ready for a signature bet?
If Garnett is not traded this summer, there is no bet.
If Garnett is traded for a more attractive package than the board proposal, you win.
If Garnett is traded for a less attractive package than the board proposal (or, miraculously, for the board proposal itself), I win.
You can name the terms.
George O'Brien said:Less attractive to whom?
Marion/KT/James Jones and 2 first rounders was my idea.asudevil83 said:any trade for Garnett is going to involve some SERIOUS salary shedding. Marion/Kurt/Barbosa would most likely be shipped out, giving us the look of a revolving door team (much like Dallas).
BEERZ said:Marion/KT/James Jones and 2 first rounders was my idea.
BEERZ said:Marion/KT/James Jones and 2 first rounders was my idea.
Minny gets 2 bigs(one all-star)and an up and comming 6'8" shooter with D. Pluss the 2 draft picks gives them optimism for the future to sell to the fans.
The Suns get a superstar who will put the team over the top in wins & Salary. He brings tuffness, rebounding, defence. A HALF COURT GAME
The Suns would lose some depth but would be a MUCH better team and it would take alot of pressure off Nash.
But the trade also has to make sence for the Suns.elindholm said:The Marion/Barbosa/picks package would be more attractive to Minnesota. They have no interest in Thomas at this stage, and Barbosa is much more appealing than Jones. The only reason they might want Thomas would be if they could convince Phoenix to take on a bad contract (most likely Hudson) in return.
BEERZ said:But the trade also has to make sence for the Suns.
Adding Garnett and not moving KT makes a huge log jam at forward/center spot.
It wouldnt make sence to have Amare, KT, Diaw, Garnett, Grant. Pluss if we didnt send KT the Suns would be WAY over the cap. I dont see Sarver going way over the cap to win.
KT still has some value Bigs allways do. Minny adds like 17pts and 11 rebounds in stats pluss 2 first rounders. Not to mention KT's contract is up in two years giving the Wolves cap relief a year earlier...
I think it makes sence for both teams.
I agree Barbosa would be alot more attractive to minny.cheesebeef said:The deal you proposed above makes NO SENSE for Minnesota. KT on a completely rebuilding team (like Minny would be) would be USELESS - Barbs and the picks and Marion is the only way Minny does that deal - 1) because Jame Jones hasn't proven ANYTHING - Barbs is young, the fastest guard in the league and has wowed people in the playoffs - period - he has to be in the deal.
As far as a log jam at PF and Center and that being a problem with us... Brian Grant creating a logjam? Are you kidding me? The only place Grant creates a problem is sitting in Amare's seat on the bench when Amare come sout of the game. With Amare, Diaw, Garnett and KT we have 4 guys who will man the entire frontcourt, allowing us to go big or small. I mean, God forbid the Suns ACTUALLY have depth with big guys with KT and Diaw coming off the bench - or more than likely, just KT coming off the bench because Amare, Diaw and Garnett would start
Minnesota would laugh at Marion, KT, JJ and the picks - and as well they should - like I said, IF they decide they have to trade Garnett, they're gonna be looking for Barkley-type deal = an established star (Marion = Horny), an up and comer (Barbosa much > Tim Perry and picks (Two draft picks, one likely lotto pick). They're not gonna get a better offer than that from anyone - especially considering that the Hawks are STILL going to suck next year and next year's draft is shaping up as one of the best in a very long time with all the Florida kids going back to school and with Oden and OJ Mayo likely coming out, not to mention whoever else shoots out fo nowhere like Tyrus Thomas did this year.
BEERZ said:Trade works at realgm