I dont know if all this mess is even somewhat true but if we could get either Kobe or KG I would definitly be all for KG instead of Kobe.. Thats if we can get either one and were to make a choice..
Some poster said that KG would be willing to restructure his contract if he went to a contender. Is that true?
Ok looking at the salaries try this trade:
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2009~510~261~687~1021&teams=16~2~21~16~16
Included in that trade though is the ATL 08, #24, #29 pick from the suns to minnesota, and the #5 pick from the celtics to minnesota.
The celtics recieve marion, and they also give up the last year of worthless expensive ratliff and scrub scalabrines long contract. On the negative side they have to give up the #5.
Suns get KG and lose their picks and jones.
Minnesota gets an assload of picks and Jones as a decent player to try as a swingman. On the negative side they have to take the last year of theo, which is not that bad as he has a nice big expiring. The only major negative is scalabrines long but not too large around 3.2 mil per for 3 years contract.
What do you think guys? I know boston would be crazy not to do this, they are not very high on the #5 pick. Suns would obviously do it. Deal or no deal from minnesota?
My immediate reaction was "BS". Then I clicked the link and saw who it was. I'm fairly confident I actually know who that poster is (he's got a history), and he would know what he's talking about. If it were anybody else I wouldn't even waste my time with it. Needless to say I'm a little worried.
Obviously it would be a horrible decision. There's only one guy on Phoenix that could match KG's impact, and he most certainly wouldn't be involved in a trade.
You cant restructure but KG might be up for an extension.
Maybe Kerr's closed door meeting with Banks was about getting a feel from him how KG would fit in chemistry wise.
Uh, if this dealing happens, barbosa will absolutely be involved.
Uh, if this dealing happens, barbosa will absolutely be involved.
I'm willing to lose him if we have a starting lineup of Nash, Amare, Garnett and Bell...
Goodness.
It makes the deal a bit more complicated though salary matching wise, but this is the type of input I want to hear so I can try to whip something up. Lemme try out this one and come back.
It actually works just fine in trade machiney:
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/featur...~2009~510~261~687~1021&teams=16~16~2~21~16~16
Same deal as before, but I am thinking maybe boston throws in #32 to minny to give the chance for them to package #24,29,32 to maybe move up a bit in the draft?
In that case how would minnesota NOT do this?
Garnett
Amare
Hill
Bell
Nash
Bench: Barbosa, Diaw, Jones, #24
Damn!
If we're NOT trading KT, in any KG package, I would try to hang onto the #24 so we could package it along with KT or along with Banks in another move, though it wouldn't at all be a deal killer....
BTW - I wan't complainging on the first post above CI's here - just making a point. I have been one of the biggest KG proponents here all along....
Garnett
Amare
Hill
Bell
Nash
Bench: Barbosa, Diaw, Jones, #24
Damn!
Garnett
Amare
Hill
Bell
Nash
Bench: Barbosa, Diaw, Jones, #24
Damn!
KG is not going to cost Marion, Barbosa and Atlantas pick, that is ridiculous and Phoenix wouldn't even consider it.
KG is 31 years old, makes over 20M$, will only accept to be traded to a contender most likely and is probably unhappy as well without going public like Kobe.
That alone limits the possibilities A LOT. See what Philly got for Iverson for what the Lakers got for O'Neal.