OT: Does Mike Brown know how to make Nash and Kobe work?

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
They will run the coaches O in practice,and Kobes O in game. Col. Sanders never coached anyone to a championship. He had Jordan and a team of superstars. And Kobe and a team of superstars.


When the lights come on, the players on the court (Nash) will decide what the O is.
 

Hat

Return of the Dragon!
Joined
May 16, 2007
Posts
1,259
Reaction score
0
Location
SoCal
He's a bad coach and am really surprised the Lakers picked him to succeed Phil. Nash will suck in whatever offense he picks. The guy just needs to coach defense, leave the O up to Nash.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,361
Reaction score
11,455
I hope not. But I think Nash is good enough to coach that offense on the court no matter how dumb Brown is.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,541
Reaction score
9,821
Location
L.A. area
I really wouldn't worry about an offense that begins with Nash, Bryant, Howard, and Gasol scoring enough points.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,190
Reaction score
6,664
They will run the coaches O in practice,and Kobes O in game. Col. Sanders never coached anyone to a championship. He had Jordan and a team of superstars. And Kobe and a team of superstars.


When the lights come on, the players on the court (Nash) will decide what the O is.
Just because the superstar is the centerpiece of an offense doesn't mean he is running his own offense. Part of the reason Phil Jackson's teams were so successful was because of the triangle offense.
 
OP
OP
JCSunsfan

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
My expectation is that Kobe will resist Nash at first. But once Nash starts running the O and Kobe receives the ball in places where he can score with ease, he will start to really like it. If Nash were a little younger, he could really extend Kobe's career. Nash is just too old to make a difference for 3 or 4 years.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
My expectation is that Kobe's inflated ego will get in the way of the Lakers success.

Kobe is not that good of a player anymore and the Lakers will be best if they heavily rely on Nash handling the ball and pick and rolls with Howard and Gasol all day. That will not please Kobe and from everything I have seen Kobe absolutely sucks as a spot up shooter. He is pretty good with players in his face but when spotting up or left open in catch and shoot situations he is not good.

Look how bad Kobe looks on team USA when he is basically a role player who can't dominate the ball.
 

Rivercard

Too much good stuff
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
29,690
Reaction score
17,744
Location
Is everything
Nash is just too old to make a difference for 3 or 4 years.

The names on the back of the starter's jersey look very impressive, but let's look at the Lakers......

- 2 stars at the end of their careers, one of which is almost 40 YO
- They traded a center who can score and make free throws for a guy with a history of injuries
- They will be starting a streaky and violent knuclehead ironically named Peace
- The bench appears below average for the NBA. The lakers did not address their lack of depth in the offseason

The starters better be able to stay on the court. Should be interesting.
 
Last edited:

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Just because the superstar is the centerpiece of an offense doesn't mean he is running his own offense. Part of the reason Phil Jackson's teams were so successful was because of the triangle offense.

He established the triangle O as their O, and it worked very well, so they stuck with it. But he wasnt actively coaching his superstars. Once the triangle was set in place, the players were on auto pilot.


If whatever O, this "Princeton" offense, works, then the players will master it and take over. If it doesnt, the players will revert ot what they know best. Kobe might force them to go back to the triangle.

That coach has no control. The second they lose a few game and Kobe criticizes him, hes out.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,190
Reaction score
6,664
He established the triangle O as their O, and it worked very well, so they stuck with it. But he wasnt actively coaching his superstars. Once the triangle was set in place, the players were on auto pilot.


If whatever O, this "Princeton" offense, works, then the players will master it and take over. If it doesnt, the players will revert ot what they know best. Kobe might force them to go back to the triangle.

That coach has no control. The second they lose a few game and Kobe criticizes him, hes out.
I could agree that they might run their own offense with Brown, but my point was only that it wouldn't be that way with Phil Jackson largely because his offense is very effective.
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
That will not please Kobe and from everything I have seen Kobe absolutely sucks as a spot up shooter. He is pretty good with players in his face but when spotting up or left open in catch and shoot situations he is not good.
Please stop posting....please?
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
If you think that Kobe is a good catch and shoot type player you need to get your head examined.
To say that Kobe "absolutely sucks" as a spot up shooter or catch and shoot player is completely ignorant.

He's one of the best shooters in the NBA and as much as I hate him, he can score from anywhere and anyway he wants.

Is he as good now at age 33? Probably not, but still doesn't "absolutely suck".
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,361
Reaction score
11,455
To say that Kobe "absolutely sucks" as a spot up shooter or catch and shoot player is completely ignorant.

He's one of the best shooters in the NBA and as much as I hate him, he can score from anywhere and anyway he wants.

Is he as good now at age 33? Probably not, but still doesn't "absolutely suck".

Everybody's game has flaws. One of Kobe's is that he does not catch and shoot, he does not play off the ball. I dont think the Lakers will struggle on offense, but if Kobe could play a role like Ray Allen used to then they would be unstoppable. However, if Kobe is capable of playing that style he has never shown it.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
He's one of the best shooters in the NBA and as much as I hate him, he can score from anywhere and anyway he wants.

Kobe is not one of the best shooters in the NBA, seriously.

2012 - 30.3% 3s - 41% 16-23ft - 42% 10-15FT
2011 - 32.3% 3s - 38% 16-23ft - 51.5% 10-15FT
2010 - 32.9% 3s - 41% 16-23ft - 49.7% 10-15FT

Volume scorer? Yes he is good, but he is not an efficient shooter.

Star point guards and ball-dominant shooting guards rarely go together well see Kidd/Penny and other examples. Both players need the ball in their hands to be effective and as a result both underperform.

Basically you want one player to be a playmaker and the other to be a great shooter. Of course it does not hurt if both are playmakers and great shooters/off ball players. Now yes the Lakers could use Nash primarily as a shooter and Kobe could have the ball in his hands but the difference between Nash as a playmaker and Kobe is gigantic. In order to maximize the talents of Gasol and Howard, Nash should have the ball in his hands most of the time.
 
Last edited:

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
Basically you want one player to be a playmaker and the other to be a great shooter. Of course it does not hurt if both are playmakers and great shooters/off ball players. Now yes the Lakers could use Nash primarily as a shooter and Kobe could have the ball in his hands but the difference between Nash as a playmaker and Kobe is gigantic. In order to maximize the talents of Gasol and Howard, Nash should have the ball in his hands most of the time.
I am wondering how the pairing of Kobe Bryant and Steve Nash compares to that of Michael Jordan and John Paxon, then Steve Kerr.

Kobe and Michael, both Shooting Guards who need to be in the middle of the offense once the ball is in the front court, playing alongside smaller pure (and 3-point) shooters.

The only difference is that Nash is a pure Point Guard whereas Paxon and Kerr were not. Of course, there was talk of using Nash at Shooting Guard even while he was here, to keep him from wearing down as the season progressed.

What do you think?
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
Everybody's game has flaws. One of Kobe's is that he does not catch and shoot, he does not play off the ball. I dont think the Lakers will struggle on offense, but if Kobe could play a role like Ray Allen used to then they would be unstoppable. However, if Kobe is capable of playing that style he has never shown it.
Kobe's never had that opportunity to play off ball or be a catch and shoot player though.

The Lakers have always needed him to have the ball in his hands and go to work. He's been their only perimeter player who can create his own shot and the only legit offensive threat.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,361
Reaction score
11,455
Kobe's never had that opportunity to play off ball or be a catch and shoot player though.

The Lakers have always needed him to have the ball in his hands and go to work. He's been their only perimeter player who can create his own shot and the only legit offensive threat.

That is utterly false... Kobe is a ball hog who forces the offense to run through himself. Gasol and Bynum are both elite offensive threats. The Lakers should have been running their offense from the inside and working it out for several years now, but they dont, because Kobe sucks at playing off the ball and is a bad spot up shooter.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,979
Reaction score
1,059
Location
In The End Zone

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,361
Reaction score
11,455
Thank you.

Slinslin and Phrazbit...you both read that ^^ right?

Jeez, I can't believe I had to actually defend Kobe for once in my life....now I can go back to hating him :D

Being left open because teams collapse and double your big men is different than Kobe learning how to play off the ball... which is what I was talking about and something that Kobe has not done much of in his career.

And I dont think that anyone is arguing that the Lakers wouldnt be better with Nash running their offense, I question if Kobe will let Nash run it, especially late in games where Kobe has consistently gone away from any sort of offensive system besides his low efficiency iso game.
 

Magnus

Veteran
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Posts
268
Reaction score
17
Well, they are terrible in the preseason so far. 0-7.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Being left open because teams collapse and double your big men is different than Kobe learning how to play off the ball... which is what I was talking about and something that Kobe has not done much of in his career.

And I dont think that anyone is arguing that the Lakers wouldnt be better with Nash running their offense, I question if Kobe will let Nash run it, especially late in games where Kobe has consistently gone away from any sort of offensive system besides his low efficiency iso game.

They will do fine. You let Nash run the show for a while, then you go to Kobe and make Nash a spot-up shooter. When Kobe goes to the bench, you run Nash/ Gasol pick and roll every time down the floor.
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
They will do fine. You let Nash run the show for a while, then you go to Kobe and make Nash a spot-up shooter. When Kobe goes to the bench, you run Nash/ Gasol pick and roll every time down the floor.
Rocket science it isn't :lol:

I cannot think of a current NBA backcourt that would be more difficult to defend than Nash/Kobe. Throw in a frontcourt that can guard the rim and its quite ridiculous.

Luckily the Suns won't be good enough in the next couple seasons to have to lose sleep over it in a meaningful playoff series.

My hope is that Phx arrives at right about the time that Nash/Kobe is put out to pasture.
 
Top