Since my last posts seemed harsh on Len, I figured I'll make a positive post about him since I still have high hopes for Len contributing real soon
I think Len is closer to contributing than most people think - Even though I'm biased as a Len fan (I went to Maryland), I think people were too harsh on his rookie performances. Stats-wise, sure Len was bad, but Len's game isn't about stats. His length on defense and rim-protection is his biggest strength and that isn't shown in the box score. I don't have stats to back it up, but teams just didn't seem to score much in the paint when he was in the game. His PER is mainly low because of his low FG% - But taking a closer look, it's because he shot so many jump shots ... If he stayed within his limits more (like a Steven Adams), he would have shot 50+% and had a similar PER as any other Rookie ...
Len's season high in minutes was only 22 - It's hard to develop rhythm when you're not playing, especially for a big man coming off an injury. With context, I don't really see Len's rookie season as disappointing. Was he mediocre overall - Sure, but that's because every Rookie is. Every Rookie from last year either had was named Mason Plumlee, had mediocre stats, or contributed to some of the worst teams in the league ... Like most rookies, we'll be able to see Len's game more in his 2nd season. I don't think he's far off at all from contributing.