I'm not. I do hear a lot about the organization, however, being local. This gives me a perspective many on this board don't have. What actual knowledge do you bring that makes you so insultingly certain we just aren't seeing your reality?
But we were told he was a transcendent player. A player like that would excel despite a bad coach or bad system. Can't keep using the Kliff excuse.
Let’s be honest here, the Steelers haven’t been a totally dominant team since the late 70’s when Noll was a legit stud HC. Regardless of the talent they had, both Cowher & Tomlin got outcoached badly by the better teams pretty much throughout their careers. They had a 1st ballot HOF QB, great running games, great WR’s, and stout defenses. They won 1 SB each, and both of them were gift wrapped by the zebras. Tomlin hasn’t won a playoff game since 2017 and they‘ve given up 36, 45, 48, and 42 points in their last 4 playoff losses. And when they did dominate in the 70’s, it was mainly because they were the first team that ushered in the beginning of the steroids era.
Who has actually said this? You’ve been repeating this over the years, but never gave out a name.
The media when he was drafted and many of the people on this board who were pro-Kyler from day one. It's never been a question. It happened. Transcendent. Generational talent. Amazing in high school. He got all of the accolades.
Obnoxious as usual.. same ~5 people that bring all the noise on this bored, down vote any rational thinking. Never anyone else.. again - 12tds and 13ints don’t survive - that’s the only fact that has been posted. Everything else is just opinion
If he says Steve Keim then it negates his argument.
As a non-drinker, trust me, I'd never quote that drunk guy.
That looks way too much like a sports bra ...
I think it's something from the Zeke Elliott fashion line...
If the “media” & “many of the people on this board” said it, then wouldn’t it be easy to name those people? Otherwise, you’re just doing it for the “ha haaaas” & “lol” which kind of has been obvious for a while.The media when he was drafted and many of the people on this board who were pro-Kyler from day one. It's never been a question. It happened. Transcendent. Generational talent. Amazing in high school. He got all of the accolades.
No, everything is opinion. The only fact is that he's had those stats. You're absolutely certain of something, which is cool and all of us are at one time or another. Except you're trying to force it through as a given and insulting people who don't agree. Not a good way to make your point. And would you care to read back through the thread to see the rational, reasoned opinions presented before you got abrasive and devolved the conversation? Pretty easy to tell where the obnoxious started.
This is going to shock you so much that I'm going to put a spoiler warning on it.
www.arizonasportsfans.com
ASFN does have a search feature you're welcome to use. "Kyler" and "transcendent" brings up some posts by Crimson Warrior, Sooner Lou, Krang, etc. referencing the transcendent and generational talent accolades. Also, plenty of other posts by myself, Shane, TJ, cheesebeef, and others questioning the use of those terms.
It’s bizarre to me that someone who reads the board a ton doesn’t believe there’s a contingent of the board that have consistently tagged Kyler as generational/transcendent talent. That number has dwindled over the years from its largest group, but there’s still 4 or 5 members who consistently inject that argument into most discussions surrounding Kyler.
I think 2 weeks.
I asked Brian in Mesa. Brian in Mesa is the one that made the claim. So, I would expect Brian in Mesa to provide the evidence. Not anybody else.
Who is this contingent? I know I said he had the potential to be.
He IS a transcendent talent, but hasn't been able to show the consistency necessary to be counted on.
Is a group of 3 people on the board of 100s considered a contingent?
hmmmm,... cult maybe?
