Trade Targets

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,767
Reaction score
23,923
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Heard on one of the more trustworthy podcasts that Zay Jones is a Trade potential to the Chiefs, because he Will not move ahead of Wilson and the team mainly plays 12&13. We are not bringing in a WR.

Edge Or DL help.
Monti would be a buffoon in that instance.
 

JohnnyCakes

Alpha Male
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2020
Posts
4,491
Reaction score
3,307
Location
Phoenix
A crazy thought…

The Browns look like a complete dumpster fire.

What if Myles Garrett is on the block?
boy would that be fun. However i cant see the brownies trading away their 1st overall hall of fame pick.
 
OP
OP
football karma

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,245
Reaction score
14,305
It was mentioned earlier in this thread. Only reason I think they would move off him is create cap space to get rid of Watson.
the Browns are over the cap next year by ~$5m and $15mm in 2026

while not good, its manageable

it just means the Browns will spend the next two years having to gut the middle class portion of their roster in order to pay for Watson to stand on the sideline while watching a journeyman and/or drafted rookie play the position

you dont ditch your best players just because they have a big cap hit ------- you ditch the vets making big $ who are good, but aren't at the top of their position anymore and guys making $5mm a year and replace them with minimum wage players
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
15,953
Reaction score
7,765
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
the Browns are over the cap next year by ~$5m and $15mm in 2026

while not good, its manageable

it just means the Browns will spend the next two years having to gut the middle class portion of their roster in order to pay for Watson to stand on the sideline while watching a journeyman and/or drafted rookie play the position

you dont ditch your best players just because they have a big cap hit ------- you ditch the vets making big $ who are good, but aren't at the top of their position anymore and guys making $5mm a year and replace them with minimum wage players
Agreed, but if they traded their best players away to create cap space to rid themselves of an albatross contract they would be tearing it down to rebuild.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,066
Reaction score
1,749
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
the Browns are over the cap next year by ~$5m and $15mm in 2026

while not good, its manageable

it just means the Browns will spend the next two years having to gut the middle class portion of their roster in order to pay for Watson to stand on the sideline while watching a journeyman and/or drafted rookie play the position

you dont ditch your best players just because they have a big cap hit ------- you ditch the vets making big $ who are good, but aren't at the top of their position anymore and guys making $5mm a year and replace them with minimum wage players
But the Browns would need multiple 1st rounders in order to Secure all options for the New franchise QB.

I would easily send 2x 1st for the best player in the league
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,066
Reaction score
1,749
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Well I should have been more specific and said at this time. No defender is worth giving up two first rounders with where our roster is at right now.
I would disagree.

We have a Young secondary (CB) with potential. We still do not know exactly How Good They Will be, But Williams looks the part as future starter at least at a solid starter level. Melton is Getting more and more snaps with Very High grades. Thomas and Clark are Good players for 3rd to 5th options. Jones is an unknown.

Safety is a packed with talent.

Linebacker is solid and arguebly the easiest position in the league to find capable starter quality.

The issue is pass-rush and D-Line. A bunch of roster worthy players, But completely lacking really Good to elite quality.

1 elite player (pass rusher) and perhaps a 2nd round Big body to go with Robinson, BJ & Lopez, collier, Jones and Nicols (who all in their own right are Good 2nd/3rd string players)

I honestly feel that 1 elite and 1 extra quality player is enough for this defense to be top 10 - if and only if the CB room develop as We are Hoping and We at least see an early indication of.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,426
Reaction score
68,597
I would disagree.

We have a Young secondary (CB) with potential. We still do not know exactly How Good They Will be, But Williams looks the part as future starter at least at a solid starter level. Melton is Getting more and more snaps with Very High grades. Thomas and Clark are Good players for 3rd to 5th options. Jones is an unknown.

Safety is a packed with talent.

Linebacker is solid and arguebly the easiest position in the league to find capable starter quality.

The issue is pass-rush and D-Line. A bunch of roster worthy players, But completely lacking really Good to elite quality.

1 elite player (pass rusher) and perhaps a 2nd round Big body to go with Robinson, BJ & Lopez, collier, Jones and Nicols (who all in their own right are Good 2nd/3rd string players)

I honestly feel that 1 elite and 1 extra quality player is enough for this defense to be top 10 - if and only if the CB room develop as We are Hoping and We at least see an early indication of.
This makes me chuckle. As one of the leaders of the slow and steady plan, what you’re basically saying is what A LOT of said during FA while sitting on 30 million dollars. But now you think we should do this and ALSO give up multiple first rounders?
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,066
Reaction score
1,749
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
This makes me chuckle. As one of the leaders of the slow and steady plan, what you’re basically saying is what A LOT of said during FA while sitting on 30 million dollars. But now you think we should do this and ALSO give up multiple first rounders?
I see your point... It's however NOT as simple as you make it out to be.

1. Let's be clear. What I have said again and again is I get what Monti wants to do and I like it. I never said Monti should just sit on all that cap space without doing nothing.

2. I would never suggest this if the last two draft classes didn't look somewhat the part at this point. I believe that it looks like we could potentially only be 2 quality players away if the draft class(s) develop as it they look like.

3. What has changed in how you perceive my opinion. Simple... There were very few elite players in free agency to sign at critical positions. Who said that Monti didn't try and was told "Sorry No" for the few quality players available.

Quite a few teams are complete dumpster fires this early in the season. That leaves the door open for firesale. If a bonafide younger player like Garrett would become available - I would go for it in a heartbeat.

4. I am actually very disappointed with the excess cap space. I do get the part of not overpaying unless the player fit we certain criteria, bur SUPER disappointed that the excess space wasn't used to secure the team better for the future by extending core players. Froholdt made me glad. Collins surprised me, but okay considering the price tag. That White and HErnandez weren't extended is baffling for me
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,659
Posts
5,410,545
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top