All quiet on Washington front

splitsecond

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Posts
5,582
Reaction score
1,536
Location
Chandler, AZ
Greg Hardy had the charges dropped against him. Daryl Washington pleaded guilty. :shrug:

Agree, but Hardy's allegations were worse - and we all know he paid her off. Really could go either way.

It seems to me that for some reason the league is set on violating their own time limits, which means the NFLPA is probably going to get involved if we don't hear something soon.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,152
Reaction score
21,452
Location
South Bay
I'm sure you'd be saying this if Daryl was--say--a New York Jet. :rolleyes:

Considering I've been lobbying for Brady's punishment to be reduced due to being excessively punitive, I think I've been more than objective in evaluating and commenting on these suspensions

The marijuana suspension was the result of four or five failed or skipped tests. That program was collectively bargained and he's already been suspended for a quarter of the season – AND Daryl just got a $5M bonus check from the Cards while he was on the suspension.

And the league continues to rule very inconsistently on a variety of suspensions, and as I mentioned, is getting bludgeoned in federal court. Even the Hardy situation isn't completely resolved as Rosenhaus plans on taking it to court. Regardless of whether or not certain regulations have been collectively bargained, the NFL continues to abuse its power to the point in which its every word is being questioned and appealed to a higher power. That's embarrassing considering the historic feebleness of the NFLPA.

The implicit argument that you're not making here is that a guy who has a pending suspension should just double down on it. If you've already beaten your wife, might as well gone on a couple HGH cycles – as long as you behave yourself during the inevitable suspension, the NFL will let you off for one or another.

Purely hypothetical and irrelevant to the discussion. As far as we know, he's been clean and doing his due diligence to improve his life as evidenced by a reduction in his probation and being dropped to a misdemeanor.

What's even more disconcerting for the league is that the NFL had 60 days to respond to his application and it's been 67 days. Either something is amiss or the NFL is dropping the ball.
 

BurqueCardFan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Posts
1,868
Reaction score
1,912
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Agree, but Hardy's allegations were worse - and we all know he paid her off. Really could go either way.

It seems to me that for some reason the league is set on violating their own time limits, which means the NFLPA is probably going to get involved if we don't hear something soon.

Exactly. Hardy had 3 or 4 altercations related to DV. As far as I know, this was Washington's first. And just like what was said above. A case being dismissed doesn't mean they are not guilty. See Ray McDonald situation. The 9ers tried to hide behind the letter of the law and look how that worked out. Common sense needs to be used in these cases.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
he was not suspended until may 30th and the 60 days could have started may 31st this year regardless of when he filed

:shrug:
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,636
Reaction score
28,534
Location
Nowhere
By rule, decision on Daryl Washington should come down soon

TEMPE, Ariz. -- A crucial piece of information regarding Cardinals linebacker Daryl Washington’s reinstatement was revealed Tuesday morning.

Washington applied for reinstatement on May 8, according to Mike Jurecki of Fox Sports 910.

Knowing that date helps puts Washington’s future into perspective. The goal is for NFL to decide on reinstatements within 60 days of receiving an application, according to the substance-abuse policy. That window closed a week ago.

Washington applied for reinstatement almost six weeks after he was eligible.

Washington was suspended on May 30, 2014 for “at least one year” for violating the NFL’s substance-abuse policy. He previously violated the policy in 2013, when he was suspended for the first four games of the season. Washington was allowed to apply for reinstatement for his latest suspension on March 31 -- 60 days before the one-year anniversary of the letter suspending him, according to the substance abuse policy.

According to the substance-abuse policy’s “procedures for reinstatement,” if all the criteria were met by Washington and “all individuals involved in the process,” NFL commissioner Roger Goodell could have ruled on Washington’s reinstatement within 60 days of receiving the application – which would’ve been July 7.

http://espn.go.com/blog/arizona-car...ion-on-daryl-washington-should-come-down-soon
 
OP
OP
Brian in Mesa

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,144
Reaction score
25,032
Location
Killjoy Central
Washington applied for reinstatement almost six weeks after he was eligible.

:doi:
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,808
Reaction score
9,628
Location
milan-italy
i guess when washington went to visit goodell to get his suspension reduced,after his request was deny he just tried to assault the commisioner
thats the only reason to justify this absurd decision
 
OP
OP
Brian in Mesa

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,144
Reaction score
25,032
Location
Killjoy Central
My guess is he was waiting to finish up the felony case, for whatever strategic purpose.

Maybe he wanted to enjoy his favorite summertime recreational activity for as long as possible and leave some additional time for it to get out of his system...
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
Maybe he wanted to enjoy his favorite summertime recreational activity for as long as possible and leave some additional time for it to get out of his system...

whatever, he applied for reinstatement. idc why he did it when he did it. None of my business. Hopefully he gets back on the field, if not, its his loss.
 

Dude

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Posts
5,976
Reaction score
1,190
Location
OR.
This is getting old. I hate the offseason. Give me some football!
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,423
Reaction score
4,184
Location
Monroe NC
Washington applied for reinstatement almost six weeks after he was eligible.

:doi:

This is what I don't get. You are eligible to apply for reinstatement on March 31st and you wait until May 8? WHY!!! What was DW doing that he waited so long. All it did was delay everything. Is it just me or does something not smell right here. Why wait until 38 days longer than you need to? If I am the GM of a team and I have a player delay request for reinstatement for 38 days I begin to wonder how dedicated he really is to the team especially since I paid him a $5 million bonus in good faith. My gut tells me DWeed will not be a member of this team come September.
 

Catfish

Registered
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Posts
4,551
Reaction score
64
I think that you should have been wondering that over a year ago already. This guy has shown no intention of doing anything other than milking his situation for all its worth. I would be amazed to see him actually want to fight for a position on this team.

Today is the deadline for the league. They MUST announce their decision concerning D-Wash today. The wait is almost over. I see no real good coming from it either way it goes.
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,994
Reaction score
5,237
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
I think that you should have been wondering that over a year ago already. This guy has shown no intention of doing anything other than milking his situation for all its worth. I would be amazed to see him actually want to fight for a position on this team.

Today is the deadline for the league. They MUST announce their decision concerning D-Wash today. The wait is almost over. I see no real good coming from it either way it goes.

I'm not sure that there is any deadline. The NFL front office doesn't seem to have any set rules that it follows on any of these matters. Its very frustrating. :bang:
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,152
Reaction score
21,452
Location
South Bay
This is what I don't get. You are eligible to apply for reinstatement on March 31st and you wait until May 8? WHY!!! What was DW doing that he waited so long. All it did was delay everything. Is it just me or does something not smell right here. Why wait until 38 days longer than you need to? If I am the GM of a team and I have a player delay request for reinstatement for 38 days I begin to wonder how dedicated he really is to the team especially since I paid him a $5 million bonus in good faith. My gut tells me DWeed will not be a member of this team come September.


Lets not jump to conclusions and say that since he waited to apply for reinstatement, it means he lacks dedication. What we've learned throughout this entire process is that it's pure folly to try and figure out the details when in fact, no one really knows anything. It took Mike Jurecki 10 months after the suspension to get any sort of information out of the Cardinals and the D-Wash camp beyond that "the door is open for his return." Even still, none of his sources are sharing any information. Usually, Jurecki gives us a nugget to chew on. Not here.

With that said, it's wise to just wait and see how this unique set of circumstances unfolds.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
I think that you should have been wondering that over a year ago already. This guy has shown no intention of doing anything other than milking his situation for all its worth. I would be amazed to see him actually want to fight for a position on this team.

Today is the deadline for the league. They MUST announce their decision concerning D-Wash today. The wait is almost over. I see no real good coming from it either way it goes.

There are like 3 different explanations of deadlines and all of them expired except for 60 days from his 1 year anniversary of his suspension date. That will be july 29th or so.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,423
Reaction score
4,184
Location
Monroe NC
Lets not jump to conclusions and say that since he waited to apply for reinstatement, it means he lacks dedication. What we've learned throughout this entire process is that it's pure folly to try and figure out the details when in fact, no one really knows anything. It took Mike Jurecki 10 months after the suspension to get any sort of information out of the Cardinals and the D-Wash camp beyond that "the door is open for his return." Even still, none of his sources are sharing any information. Usually, Jurecki gives us a nugget to chew on. Not here.

With that said, it's wise to just wait and see how this unique set of circumstances unfolds.

You can call it a unique set of circumstances, I call it perplexing. I would be biting at the bit to get back to playing. I would have had the request ready to go in the mail the first day I could send it. I would like to know why he waited 38 days before sending in the request for reinstatement. Waiting just delays everything. It delayed a decision and it delays a decision on the DV situation. One thing for sure, it will be interesting to see how this all plays out.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
556,091
Posts
5,432,861
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top