And what’s the success rate of Heisman winning QBs in modern football? Fairly poor by percentage so I think you’re making a terrible argument and perhaps your viewpoint above comes across as dangerously uninformed. Just sayin’.
Going back to 1984, heisman QBs:
Marriotta - jury’s out but not great
Winston - jury’s out but not great
Manziel - bust
RGIII - bust
Newton - winner
Bradford - mediocre
Tebow - bust
Troy Smith - bust
Leinart- bust
Jason white - bust
Palmer - winner
Eric crouch - bust
Chris weinke - bust
Danny wuerffel - bust
Charlie ward - NA
Gino toretta - bust
Ty detmer - bust
Andre Ware - bust
Vinny testaverde - very definition of mediocre
Doug Flutie - mediocre to incomplete
Terrible. And it's terrible that you're trolling me. Disappointing.
However, I'll play along just this one time only to defend College Football's highest honor.
Your argument is stupid because it infers that non-heisman-winning QBs leaving college and entering the NFL generally enjoy at least as much success as heisman-winning QBs, when in fact the failure rate for non-heisman winning QBs is higher.
Compare the success rate (in terms of average years in the NFL, or any other reasonable metric) for heisman-trophy-winning QBs to the success rate for all QBs entering the draft, declaring for the draft, or trying to make teams as an UDFA, and then tell me "heisman trophy QB winners suck".
The opposite is true. Winning the heisman practically guarantees a more successful NFL career than that experienced by the majority of QBs in that same QB class that don't win the heisman. There are some exceptions, sure, like poor Jason White, but you'll find my premise is generally sound. Your post leverages the fact that its hard to play QB in the NFL, but we already know that ouchie.
Also, I think I'd appreciate it if you didn't respond to my posts sir.