- Joined
- Jul 20, 2004
- Posts
- 8,942
- Reaction score
- 405
Conor Jackson! 4-3 Dbacks!
For Medders to blow, it took Valverde to blow first...medders blows!
For Medders to blow, it took Valverde to blow first...
They both blew it tonight.
Amen. But this one was on TV for me (FSNAZ), so it sucked to see them so offensively inept. It will keep the fans away for a little longer, unfortunately, IMO. Not justifiably so, but it is what it is. Boston now rolls into town and they may "pack" the stadium with 30K. The weekend series does help though.They both blew it tonight.
So, you need runs and you send up Callaspo and Hammock?
He is serviceable and can be good, but I wouldn't call him "one of the best closers in the game". The DBacks have absolutely no offense, so of course his save chances are going to be there - because either the DBacks lost or they won by only a small margin. They are in the bottom half of the league in runs scored (22 out of 30 in both BA and runs scored). Good thing they are #4 in ERA in the entire league! That is lights out, but the hitting is anemic. That puts pressure on the closer, because a blown save will then generally mean a loss for him and the team. 4 blown saves I believe and 3 if not four losses in those games for the team.what 21 saves second in mlb. Yea he didnt do great but still one of the best closers in the game. I just hope this game doesnt hurt are momentum going into the red sox series. tough loss.
Good point, but I would go with Drew rather than either of those two. No numbers to back it up, just me spouting...Who else was available at that point?
He is serviceable and can be good, but I wouldn't call him "one of the best closers in the game". The DBacks have absolutely no offense, so of course his save chances are going to be there - because either the DBacks lost or they won by only a small margin. They are in the bottom half of the league in runs scored (22 out of 30 in both BA and runs scored). Good thing they are #4 in ERA in the entire league! That is lights out, but the hitting is anemic. That puts pressure on the closer, because a blown save will then generally mean a loss for him and the team. 4 blown saves I believe and 3 if not four losses in those games for the team.
Sorry to rant - I just don't like him closing. He is not mentally tough at all. But his 9 one-run saves are pretty good nonetheless.
Sure, it's okay, but impressive is Cordero. Look, Valverde's problem is he faces way too many batters for his number of save opportunities (113 for 23) [slightly old data], so it is matter of time before his numbers correct. As a comparison, Cordero (league leader) has faced 87 through 22 save opportunities. He is a better pitcher as well as a better closer. Now some of these numbers may represent extra inning work, but I have to call that about even for all closers because I am not going to do that much research... Valverde is fine for now, but we need better - whether it is him improving (don't see it) or someone else. But perhaps I am just bitter over a "lazy" loss.So because of those stats you gave, and the fact that most of the games we play in are close makes what he is doing this season all the more impressive. 3 blown saves this year thats pretty impressive!