Can someone explain to me why Q-Rich back can be insured...but Amare Stoudemire knees can't be?
Can someone explain to me why Q-Rich back can be insured...but Amare Stoudemire knees can't be?
There is a threat of a lockout that means no revenue, but still having to pay out tons of money. I can almost guarantee a team like the Clippers will not get a max player simply because they stand to save some money if/when there is a lockout.
Wait, isn't the point of the lockout is so that the owners don't have to pay the players?
Most owners if not all will save money not having a season. The lock out will hurt the players far more than the owners. Most teams are losing money, the lockout is going to go until the players union caves. The owners will get everything they want in the end and the players will have lost a season of pay as well.
I remember that thread. I could be mistaken but i'm pretty sure i wasn't one of the members of the mob carrying torches up the hill to pull you out of the castle by force....I don't know. The Amare/Lopez combination showed considerable promise during the regular season. You can't really judge that tandem by their playoff showing as Robin was clearly a shadow of the oaf we've grown to love this year.
I started a thread a month ago that didn't go over well where I suggested we benefitted from an unusual amount of luck this year. I look at next season and cringe when I realize how unlucky we might end up being. Amare gone for nothing (or even worse, Amare recovering from his second microfracture surgery following his max dollar 5 year extension), Nash hobbling down the court for the 27 games his body holds up for and Lopez rehabbing from his 3 back surgeries are all quite possible stories next season.
Steve
IMO getting Dirk in here to replace Amare and run with Nash just keeps this team afloat a couple more years, but doesn't solve any of our problems,a Band-Aid essentially.
I realize this isn't a popular stance and i'm ok with that.
I'm curious about any theory that Sarver can outbid Cuban for Dirk. Is there any reason to think either would cooperate in this scenerio?
Stoudemire participated in much of the meeting, as Walters and the Suns' brass met for more than three hours in regard to a contract extension.
Walters said they will continue talking Wednesday, when Stoudemire could become a free agent at 9 p.m. Arizona time by exercising an early termination option in his contract that has a $17.7 million salary left on it for next season.
Suns Managing Partner Robert Sarver has stuck to the idea of giving Stoudemire a maximum-salary deal for four years (his existing remaining option season plus three more) but not for the maximum six years (option plus a five-year extension) that Stoudemire has desired. NBA sources said Sarver might be willing to change the extension's length to four years, which would give Stoudemire a five-year deal worth $107 million.
I'm curious about any theory that Sarver can outbid Cuban for Dirk. Is there any reason to think either would cooperate in this scenerio?
Nowitzki would have to be motivated by something other than maximum dollars. Of course, that possibility is the only reason for him to have opted out in the first place. It was already conceded that Cuban would pay him as much as he possibly could.
They could use that trade exception to pick up any other FA in a sign and trade (like a Lee or Dirk). It also puts the Suns in a position to take dumped players at draft time.
By opting out Dirk can re-sign for more years which is the most likely outcome.
It's the most likely, but it's not a forgone conclusion.
I know, I still have a small shred of hope the Suns will land Dirk somehow. I just fully expect Dirk to sign a 6 year max contract with the Mavs soon after FA starts.
Unless I'm mistaken, you can't combine TPE with cap space. If the Suns want to make a run at Dirk if Amare leaves they will need to find a way to unload Barbosa.
You don't have to combine it. Just use the exception.
Older players sometimes run out of gas in the playoffs.
See '09-'10 Celtics?